How risky are third-party lenses for long-term camera compatibility?
Asked 9/24/2016
7 views
2 answers
0
I’m considering third-party lenses from brands like Sigma or Tamron and want to understand the real compatibility risk compared with first-party lenses. Since third-party makers often rely on reverse-engineering a camera mount’s electronic communication, how often do compatibility problems actually happen? Are issues more likely with new camera bodies or firmware updates rather than with a lens that already works on my current camera? If incompatibility does happen, what usually stops working first—autofocus, aperture control, lens identification, or the ability to shoot at all? And can firmware updates from the lens maker usually fix it, or can an older lens become permanently limited on newer bodies?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
7
But if you buy a 3rd party lens then theoretically it could stop working tomorrow.
Only if you try to use it with a camera model newer than the third party lens. If it worked with your camera when you first got it, it should continue to work with that camera. There's really no additional risk that it will suddenly stop working with a camera with which it currently works. Where the compatibility issues come in is when the camera maker introduces newer camera models that weren't available when the 3rd party lens company developed their lens.
That means that if you buy a 1st party lens, it's guaranteed to work with your camera.
Not necessarily, even though the risk is certainly much, much lower. But it does occasionally happen with first party lenses. When Canon introduced the 7D Mark II there was an initial compatibility issue with AF at focal lengths of around 100-130mm with the EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II. Canon issued a firmware update for the 7D Mark II a few weeks later that fixed the issue.
In reality, how common is it for a 3rd party lens to quit working due to an incompatibility? Is this a common problem or just a theoretical possibility? If your favourite 3rd party lens suddenly stops working, what can you do about it? Is the lens manufacturer going to care, or do you just have to toss the lens in the bin and go buy something else?
It seems you are assuming that a third party lens model can just spontaneously stop working with the same cameras with which it has previously worked. That is not the risk of buying a third party lens. I guess it's possible a firmware update to the camera could theoretically cause issues with a third party lens that previously was fully functional, but I've never encountered such a situation. The issue is usually only seen when trying to use an existing third party lens with a newly introduced camera model that wasn't available when the lens was being designed. Such lenses will continue to work with the cameras with which they previously worked.
Lens manufacturers, including third party makers, will vary with how much they stand behind and support their lenses. The two or three largest names in the third party lens market tend to support them very well. In the past firmware updates would often be made available but required a trip to a service center to be applied to the lens. Often these were offered at no or very little cost for a specified time period after issues were discovered and corrected through a firmware update.
Recently, though, Sigma and now Tamron have developed hardware docks and made them available to end users so that the firmware running in lenses can be updated by the owner without having to send the lens off to the manufacturer's service facility. It's as simple as downloading the updated firmware and using a USB dock to load it onto your lens.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The main risk is usually with newer camera bodies or camera firmware, not a lens that already works on your current body. If a third-party lens works today with your camera, it generally won’t just “stop” unless something physically fails or you change bodies/firmware.
When incompatibility does happen, it’s typically electronic communication issues: autofocus may fail, aperture control or lens reporting may act oddly, or some features may not work correctly. That does not usually mean the optics are useless; many lenses can still be used with reduced functionality.
This is a real but generally low risk, especially with newer lenses that support firmware updates. Sigma and Tamron have offered update paths for some lenses, which can restore compatibility after camera changes. Older lenses without update options are more vulnerable to permanent limitations on newer bodies.
First-party lenses are lower risk, but not absolutely immune to compatibility quirks either.
Practical takeaway: third-party lenses are usually safe purchases, especially recent models with firmware support. If you own one, be cautious about installing brand-new camera firmware immediately, and check compatibility notes first.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why do some third-party lenses have compatibility issues on newer camera bodies?
Can a Nikon firmware update break autofocus on Sigma lenses?
Can a phone gain RAW photo capture through a software update, or does the hardware have to support it?
How reliable is shutter count on Canon and Nikon cameras?
Do quality lenses really stay usable for a lifetime?