How does Fujifilm Superia compare with Kodak Portra color negative film?
Asked 9/5/2014
1 views
2 answers
0
I'm new to color film and have mostly shot black-and-white so far. I use a Pentax ME Super and can currently find Fujifilm Superia and Kodak Portra locally. What practical differences should I expect between these two color negative films in terms of grain, contrast, saturation, and overall color rendering? Are they suited to different subjects, and are there other common color negative film options worth considering?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
12
Portra is a low-contrast, low-saturation film made primarily for wedding and portrait photographers (it's the successor to Vericolor III Professional). It's designed to capture the details in both the white wedding dress and the black tuxedo at the same time, while rendering pleasing, blemish-minimized skin tones. There's nothing special about its grain structure or resolution; it's about par for the course in last-generation colour films. As with most colour negative film, you can increase the saturation and contrast by slightly overexposing (shooting the 160, for instance, as if it were ISO 100) without any special development (as long as you don't go over by more than 2/3 of a stop), but that just gets you into the same sort of range as general-purpose consumer films. Pushing it (underexposing by 1 or 2 stops, then having the film developed to compensate) will result in a grainy pastel-coloured image. This film would definitely not be your first choice for shooting autumn foliage, but if you want to flatter people or create something just a little bit on the sentimental side, it's a great choice.
Superia is a general-purpose film designed to be a bit "snappy". The colours aren't super-saturated, but they're definitely there in an unmistakable way, and there's a lot more contrast in the midtones. (You can bring the saturation and contrast down a touch by very slightly underexposing; again by no more than 2/3 of a stop, and you'll suffer a slight grain penalty doing so.) You'll want to be a lot more careful shooting people; if you want a polished, commercial look for fashion-type shots, then good makeup isn't optional. As with most films designed for slightly higher contrast and saturation, the grain is a little bit smaller and "tighter". If you want "candy colours" in a fashion shoot or are shooting things other than people, this is probably the film you want (if Portra is the alternative).
Originally by user28116. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user28116
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Kodak Portra and Fujifilm Superia are both color negative films, but they’re aimed at somewhat different looks.
Portra is generally described as a professional portrait/wedding film: lower contrast, lower saturation, wide exposure latitude, and flattering skin tones. It’s designed to hold detail well in bright and dark areas. Users often describe its color as softer or more pastel, and at least one comparison here found Portra to have finer grain than Superia.
Superia is more of a general-purpose consumer color negative film. In practice, the difference may not always be huge, and lab processing/scanning can affect the final look a lot.
On “noise”: with film, that’s really grain. Based on the answers provided, Portra tends to be finer-grained, while Superia can look a bit coarser depending on speed and processing.
If you want softer, more subdued color and finer grain, Portra is likely the better fit. If you want an everyday color negative film, Superia is a reasonable choice.
Other commonly mentioned color negative alternatives include Kodak Ektar 100, other Portra speeds (160/400/800), and brands such as Agfa, Cinestill, and Lomography, depending on local availability.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What dynamic range can I expect from commonly available 35mm films like Velvia, Ektar, and Portra 160?
How do consumer color film, Kodak Portra, and Ilford black-and-white film differ?
Do different color films have different color temperatures or just different color rendering?
What current black-and-white 35mm film is closest to Kodak Panatomic-X?
What inexpensive ISO 400 color film is good for learning film photography?