How does anti-blur software sharpen a blurry photo?
Asked 8/4/2015
6 views
2 answers
0
I’ve seen software that can reduce blur in a photo, sometimes with surprisingly good results. How do these programs work, and why can’t they perfectly fix every blurry image?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
3
There are some software packages which do this.
Vladimir Yuzhikov's SmartDeblur and the much more complete ImageMagick come in mind as first free solutions but most probably there are other ones.
The most common approach is the one which is the deconvolution based on the Wiener filter
If you want to read more, there are also other methods for achieving this.
From the tone of your question I assume that there exists a small possibility to be a little distant from the mathematical apparatus which appears in the links above, hence I'll try to explain in few, inexact and lay therms what is happening:
A deconvolution method tries to minimize the 'noise' (unwanted information) from a certain data. There are two important things here:
- How to find what is 'noise' (simply said, is based on its frequency in an image)
- How to remove it (based on a target mathematical/statistical function which must reach an extreme - minimum or maximum - depending on the method employed)
I hope that I wasn't too scientific.
Originally by user952. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user952
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Anti-blur software usually works by deconvolution. A blurry photo can be thought of as the original image plus a blur pattern and some noise. The software tries to estimate that blur pattern, then mathematically reverse it to recover detail.
A common method is based on Wiener deconvolution, which attempts to undo blur while limiting the amplification of noise. In simple terms, the program must estimate two things: what part of the image is true detail, and what part is unwanted blur/noise. That estimate is never perfect, which is why results vary.
This works best when the blur is relatively simple and predictable, such as mild motion blur or defocus. It works less well when the blur is severe, the image is very noisy, or important detail has been completely lost. In those cases, the software can only make an educated guess, sometimes creating artifacts or an overprocessed look.
So anti-blur tools are not really “restoring” lost information perfectly—they are using mathematical models to infer what the sharp image probably looked like.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How do Rodenstock circular polarizers compare with B+W, Heliopan, and Hoya HD?
How can I reduce motion blur in Photoshop without creating a doubled image?
How do single-image ‘fake HDR’ programs create an HDR-like look?
Why won’t Lightroom 3 or Photoshop Elements 13 open Canon 7D Mark II RAW (.CR2) files?
Why do image averaging and lower resolution reduce noise?