How does a beauty dish affect skin texture, and is the center actually softer than the edge?
Asked 3/3/2019
4 views
2 answers
0
I’ve noticed that a beauty dish seems to produce softer light in the center, while the light becomes more directional and harder toward the edge. That feels opposite to how beauty dishes are often described online, where they’re sometimes said to be unflattering for skin with wrinkles or blemishes.
When used close to the subject—roughly 1–2 dish diameters away—it seems like the center of the dish can soften facial detail, while feathering the dish places the subject more in the harder, more directional part of the beam. That would mean the center might actually be better for minimizing skin texture, while the outer area gives more contour and shadow.
Is that understanding correct, assuming this is a true beauty dish and not a deep parabolic reflector?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
3
Your diagram definitely supports your observations.
Although not currently using one, and taking your diagram into consideration, having used beauty dishes in the past, this is what I found; (most of which is in agreement to what you are saying.)
• Unlike a large softbox, the beauty dish is designed to be used to create shadows.
• Depending on how far back the beauty dish is, if the subject moves, the light will change very dramatically as the subject moves out of the centre soft light and into the outer harder directional light.
• Based on the placement (the distance from the subject) of the beauty dish, you are able to contour and etch out the cheek bones and the chin and retain the center softness of the face. Something that the softbox does not achieve. This is happening because of the low contrast indirect light in the centre hitting the subject in the middle of the face, and the harder directional light feathering on the cheeks.
• By lifting it higher than the subjects face, you can create a fuller looking bottom lip whilst retaining a soft middle part of the face but still have beautifully contoured cheek bones.
• By fixing a diffuser sock in front of the dish, it is able to more closely mimic a softbox as some of the hard-directional light is deflected back in before leaving.
• And as you suggest in your question, depending on the size of the beauty dish and the size of the deflector inside, it is possible to bring the dish in close enough to dramatically reduce skin details, but you have to take the inverse square law into consideration where the sudden light fall off will cause very extreme outer edges.
• To really get a broader soft light, you need to move your beauty dish further back and look at the shadow on a wall and place your subject inside this shadow. This will avoid the outer hard light hitting the subject and you will create a more feathered look. Of course, you will have to bump up the light output.
• And finally, the directional outer light is great at bouncing back off a reflector.
So, I don’t believe you are wrong, but it is possible that some of the articles and tutorials on the internet that you have come across may be somewhat confusing or perhaps just misleading because the Beauty Dish can be used for both hard Edgy light, of very soft low contrast image.
And it is definitely not focused light. to get the soft look, you are shooting in the shadow of the light.
Originally by user34085. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user34085
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Your understanding is basically correct. A beauty dish is not the same as a large softbox: it’s designed to keep some softness while still creating shape and shadows.
Used close to the subject, the center of the beam can look softer, while the outer area is more directional and gives stronger contouring. That’s why beauty dishes can emphasize cheekbones and chin better than a softbox, but also why small subject movements can change the look quickly if the light is close.
So the common advice that a beauty dish is “bad for bad skin” is too simplistic. It depends on distance, exact dish design, and whether the face is placed in the center of the beam or feathered toward the edge. If you feather it, you’re more likely to get the harder, more textured look. If you use the center area at close range, you can retain some softness while still getting definition.
In short: you’re not really wrong—beauty dishes give a mix of softness and directionality, and placement within the beam matters a lot.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why can feathering a light make the result look softer?
What should you call the opposite of feathering a light?
Is a single speedlight powerful enough for a 22-inch beauty dish?
How does modifier size affect light coverage and softness?
What do grids and deeper octa/parabolic softboxes actually change?