How does a 1.5× crop factor change sensor dimensions and area compared with full frame?

Asked 6/1/2015

6 views

2 answers

0

I found an article claiming that a camera with a 1.5× crop factor has a sensor that is “43% smaller in both width and height” than a 35mm full-frame sensor, and therefore has “66% less area.”

That doesn’t seem right to me. If full frame is 36×24mm, then wouldn’t a 1.5× crop sensor have linear dimensions of 1/1.5 = 0.67 of full frame, meaning about 33% smaller in width and height? And wouldn’t the area be (1/1.5)^2 ≈ 0.44 of full frame, meaning about 56% less area rather than 66%?

What is the correct way to interpret crop factor here?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

11y ago

2 Answers

6

There are many various film and digital sensor sizes and formats.

135 film (also known as "full-frame") became the most used film in the 60s and the most common format was 3/2, meaning 36mm x 24mm frame size. The camera determined the format/ratio but was always 24mm high. There were even half frame cameras that used this film but would result in 18mm x 24mm frame sizes and would fit almost twice as many photos in one roll.

enter image description here

EDITED PHOTO FROM WIKI AND ABOVE LINK

APS was also a film size and the classic, 3/2 ratio/format, had a size of 24mm x 16mm (roughly).

For APS film, the height (red side) of the film was/is 16mm. This is where the "crop factor" comes in.

16mm x 1.5 = 24mm

And also relates to the field of view. If you have a 50mm lens on a full frame camera but placed it on an APS-C camera, you would get a different (cropped) field of view. So a 34mm lens, x 1.5 = 50mm (actually 52.5, but I'm rounding it down. REALLY rounding it down...).

In summary, if you had 2 cameras. 1 with ASP-C with a 35mm lens and a full frame with a 50mm lens, they would almost be seeing exactly the same thing.

Regarding surface area, yes, there is even more reduction.

So:

36mm x 24mm = 864mm² (full frame)

24mm x 16mm = 384mm² (APS-C)

As a percentage of area, the APS-C only covers 44% of the full frame. This is not the "crop factor".

EDIT: I'd like to add that digital cameras are capable of all sorts of different aspect ratios now which "crop" the sensor being used, anyway. It, in turn, changes the surface area yet will still be referred to as a FF or ASP crop camera.

Originally by user11789. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user11789

11y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

You’re right: the article’s math is wrong.

A 1.5× crop factor means the sensor’s linear dimensions are divided by 1.5 relative to full frame, so each dimension is about 0.667× as large. That means the width and height are about 33% shorter, not 43%.

Using full frame as 36×24mm:

  • width: 36 / 1.5 = 24mm
  • height: 24 / 1.5 = 16mm

So a typical 1.5× sensor is about 24×16mm.

Area scales with the square of the linear factor:

  • area ratio = (1 / 1.5)^2 = 1 / 2.25 ≈ 0.444

So the crop sensor has about 44% of full-frame area, which means it has about 56% less area, not 66% less.

Crop factor is mainly a ratio of sensor dimensions/diagonal, and it affects field of view compared with full frame. The article appears to have simply made arithmetic mistakes when converting those ratios into percentages.

UniqueBot

AI

11y ago

Your Answer