How do star trackers prevent blur during multi-minute exposures, and what image-quality benefits do they provide?
Asked 9/15/2016
11 views
2 answers
0
I’m trying to understand how a star tracker works for astrophotography. My understanding is that you can set a DSLR to a long exposure, such as 5 minutes, and the tracker rotates to follow the stars.
What I don’t understand is:
- How can a 5-minute exposure stay sharp if the camera is moving during the exposure?
- Compared with an untracked exposure of about 15–25 seconds, how much improvement does a star tracker actually give, and why?
I’m mainly interested in whether a tracker is worth using for sharper, cleaner night-sky photos.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
4
How are you able to take a picture for 5 minutes while the camera is moving and not have the picture be blurry?
The stars are moving across the sky. More accurately, the Earth is rotating beneath the stars. The mount moves the camera very smoothly at the same speed as the sky appears to move from the Earth's surface so that the camera stays pointed at the same spot in the sky as the Earth rotates underneath it.
The pictures taken with the 5 minute exposures/mounts only compare to 5 minutes with no mount, and not 15-25 seconds no mount–how much better are these pictures and how so?
Longer exposures help in several ways:
- You can use a narrower aperture. This allows you to use the "sweet spot"of the lens you are using. Most lenses are softest and show the effects of aberrations the most when used at their widest aperture. Narrowing the aperture by two or three stops usually gives you the lens' best performance. It also allows you to avoid the need for very expensive, very wide aperture lenses.
- You can use a lower ISO setting. By collecting more light with a long exposure time you don't need to amplify the signal from the sensor as much. The problem with amplifying the signal too much as that you also amplify noise along with the signal (light). Less amplification is particularly helpful with reducing read noise which is in the same spot in every frame.
- You can take multiple exposures and combine (stack) them while covering the same part of the sky without repositioning the camera between each shot. This is another technique used to increase the signal to noise ratio by minimizing the random noise that appears in different spots in each frame.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A star tracker works by moving the camera smoothly at the same rate the sky appears to move, caused by Earth’s rotation. Because the camera follows the stars, the stars stay in the same place on the sensor instead of streaking, so the image can remain sharp even during a multi-minute exposure.
The camera moving is not the problem—unwanted relative motion is. If the mount is aligned and tracking correctly, the stars are effectively “still” relative to the camera.
Compared with a short untracked exposure, tracking mainly helps by allowing much more total light from faint stars and deep-sky objects to reach the sensor before trails appear. That can improve image quality by letting you:
- gather more light and reveal fainter detail,
- use a narrower aperture, where many lenses perform better,
- potentially use lower ISO for cleaner files.
So the benefit is not just “5 minutes versus 15 seconds”; it’s brighter, cleaner, more detailed night-sky images with less compromise in aperture and sensitivity, assuming the tracker is properly set up.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can you use a shifted tilt-shift lens on a star tracker for night landscapes?
What do “tracked” and “untracked” exposures mean in astrophotography?
How can I get multi-minute daytime long exposures when a 9-stop ND filter isn’t enough?
Affordable tracking options for wide-angle Milky Way photography
Can you make 5-minute exposures with a 4x5 large format camera?