How do I test whether my Sigma 10-20mm is focusing accurately and sharp enough?

Asked 10/15/2010

3 views

2 answers

0

I bought a Sigma 10-20mm (Canon mount) and want to check whether my copy has any real sharpness or autofocus issues before deciding whether to return it. I first compared it on a tripod against my 18-55mm kit lens using a barcode target, but I’m not sure that test is reliable. The Sigma appears a little softer, and the focus seems shifted toward the back of the depth of field in some shots. What’s a better way to test an ultra-wide lens for focus accuracy and sharpness, and how should I interpret small front/back focus shifts at 10mm versus 20mm?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

8

Some key points:

Focus points are larger than the LED that lights up. As a result, the camera will pick anything within the area, usually the with the most contrast (often what is closest yet not too far on the edge of the AF sensor).

Depth of field is larger with a shorter focal length, and of course with a smaller aperture. What this means is that the AF sensor will say that the area is in focus even though it is on the edge of the field in focus and not centered.

Some other interesting facts about focusing:

Some lenses, due to spherical aberration, change their plane focus when stopped down from wide open. This mostly affects fast lenses.

Many AF sensors are only accurate to around f4 or f5.6. This means it will stop when an object is within the acceptable focus for a depth of field as if the lens was at f4 or f5.6.

To really check for accurate focus, you should use a focus chart with only one spot of contrast, so you can be sure of where you are focusing. I like to use this, page 18.

An even better test is the moire interference test.

Lastly, many lenses perform quite different at close focus distances (usually much worse, with softness, haloing, and other aberrations that may not be present at all otherwise). Try to take some pictures of objects further away and compare it to full-sized samples from the same model.

Originally by user389. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user389

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Your barcode/angled-target comparison isn’t a very reliable way to judge this. AF points are larger than the illuminated box in the viewfinder, so the camera may lock onto a nearby high-contrast area you didn’t intend. With an ultra-wide lens, depth of field is also much larger, so focus may look slightly forward or back while still being within acceptable focus.

A better test is a proper focus chart or flat, detailed target, shot carefully on a tripod with controlled technique. Check results at different focal lengths and apertures. Also remember that some lenses can shift focus slightly when stopped down, and many AF systems are only accurate to about f/4-f/5.6 tolerances.

From your follow-up, it sounds like 20mm is essentially spot-on and 10mm may show a small front-focus shift, but still within acceptable depth of field. For the kind of use most 10mm lenses get—especially landscapes stopped down—that level of variation is usually not a practical problem.

So: test with a proper chart, don’t rely too much on angled-sheet tests, and judge the lens by real-world images you actually make. If your normal photos look good, the lens is probably fine.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer