How can you shoot 4x5 large-format from a small prop plane without excessive blur?
Asked 4/25/2018
2 views
2 answers
0
I’m trying to understand practical ways to make aerial large-format photography work from a small prop plane, especially with a bellows camera and relatively slow shutter speeds. I’d avoid shooting through the aircraft window, but I’m unsure how to deal with wind, aircraft vibration, and camera shake when hand-holding or suspending the camera. Historical aerial photographers like Bradford Washburn used large metal-bodied cameras and harnesses rather than tripods. What stabilization approaches make sense for this kind of setup today?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
3
How did Washburn do it? In a word, mass.
Washburn used cameras such as the Fairchild K-20 and K-22, the latter of which is nothing to trifle with. An example in the National Air & Space museum is 15" × 17" x 31", with a lens focal length of 24" (635mm), made primarily of anodized steel. I'm willing to bet that beast is 30 lbs. or more.
Heavy mass on suspended mounts allow for the camera to act as its own stabilization system, to a degree. More mass equals more inertia, and inertia is the defining property of mass to be resistant to changes in momentum. I'm sure if Washburn had used some sort of pintle or gimbal mount for his camera, he'd have many fewer keepers — the direct mount would have transmitted more vibrations to the camera body, resulting in increased motion blur.
Actually, as with everything photographic, I'm sure technique was just as much in play. You can't take good images with longer shutter durations from a bouncing mount — good weather and smooth winds are required. But in a sense, this isn't much different than lots of landscape photography. Sometimes you have to pick your days to get your shot.
In your situation, with a flexible bellows, I would probably construct a "blimp" of sorts to completely enclose the camera (except for the front of the lens). Normally a blimp is used to silence a camera in situations where the camera sounds would be inappropriate (such as taking stills on film sets during production, or during live opera and stage performances, etc.). But in this case, the blimp is used to shield the bellows, lens and camera standards, and anything else that is less than sturdy, from the wind. Perhaps a simple telescoping box enclosure, maybe felt-lined along the telescoping parts to provide some stability and isolation. You'd probably need to cut some holes to allow access to the focusing rack. But you could provide a door, flap, or just tape over the holes when focus is achieved.
You might consider rigging a harness similar to Washburn's. You won't have nearly as much mass as Washburn's cameras had, but adding dead weight to an object is a simple task.
Originally by user11924. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11924
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The main historical solution was mass. Large aerial cameras such as the Fairchild K-20/K-22 were extremely heavy, and that inertia helped resist small vibration and sudden movement. In other words, the camera’s own weight acted as a stabilizer better than a light bellows camera would.
A rigid direct mount to the aircraft can actually transmit vibration, so a suspended or body-supported setup may be preferable to a simple hard mount. That helps isolate the camera from engine and airframe vibration.
For a modern approach, you’d look at stabilization systems that isolate operator movement and vibration rather than a tripod. In motion work, a Steadicam-type stabilizer is the classic example; while video tolerates more motion than still photography, the same principle of mechanical isolation can still be useful.
So the practical answer is: a lightweight 4x5 is at a disadvantage here. To improve results, use as much mass and vibration isolation as is safely manageable, avoid rigid mounts that pass aircraft vibration straight into the camera, and consider professional stabilizer solutions designed to decouple camera movement from the operator and aircraft.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can you make 5-minute exposures with a 4x5 large format camera?
Will a Rodenstock Sironar-N 240mm f/5.6 work on a 4x5 large format camera?
How could historical war photos freeze fast action without obvious blur or grain?
What camera and lens features matter most for aerial real-estate photography?
Do I need standard folding bellows if my bag bellows covers 75mm to 210mm on 4x5?