How can I tell whether my 3x teleconverter or my lens is causing soft images?

Asked 1/19/2020

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m using a Kenko 3x teleconverter on a Canon 5D Mark II and getting generally soft images, even on a tripod. I’d like to separate teleconverter softness from the way a converter magnifies a lens’s own flaws. Is there a good way to test this objectively, or to choose lenses that are suitable for evaluating teleconverter quality? I’m especially interested in affordable vintage telephoto primes, but I’m open to other practical testing approaches.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

6y ago

2 Answers

3

You can figure out whether the TC is the major cause of loss of sharpness by measuring lens resolution with and without TC.

  • Measure lpmm using a resolution test chart without TC. If you max out the resolution of the chart, increase the distance between the camera and the chart. Most good vintage primes will easily max out that chart.

    lpmm = (line pairs)/(height of image on sensor)

    If the chart takes up half the sensor height, use half the physical size of the sensor in the calculation.

  • Measure lpmm with TC and multiply the result by the conversion factor.

  • If the adjusted lpmm with TC is less than the lpmm with lens alone, the TC is the likely major cause of reduced sharpness.

  • If lpmm is greater or equal, then reduced sharpness is likely caused mainly by lens limitations. (TC effects can be considered negligible.)

    Is this even possible? – I can't find the link anymore, but I read a review of a lens that performed better with TC than without. It could be caused by aperture effects or the TC somehow correcting lens defects, like when humans wear glasses. (If a TC corrects a particular lens' defects, it could be considered a bad TC because it probably wouldn't work well with other lenses.)

    There could also be small measurement errors. If TC-lpmm > lens-lpmm as a result of small measurement errors, the loss from TC could be considered inconsequential. (We're not working with lab grade equipment to measure MTF.)

Originally by user75526. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user75526

6y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The most reliable approach is to test the same lens with and without the teleconverter under controlled conditions.

Use a resolution chart and measure resolution in line pairs per mm (lp/mm) without the TC, then repeat with the TC. Adjust the TC result by the converter factor. If the adjusted resolution is still lower than the lens-alone result, the teleconverter is likely the main source of softness. If it’s similar, the lens is probably the limiting factor and the TC is mostly magnifying that.

A practical alternative is to compare the lens on a smaller-sensor or very high-resolution camera. An APS-C body effectively gives similar framing to a 1.5x/1.6x crop without adding teleconverter optics. If the lens looks sharp there but soft with the 3x TC, the converter is the likely culprit.

For test lenses, don’t rely too much on lists alone—sample variation matters, especially with vintage glass. What you want is a high-resolution lens, not just a high-contrast one; MTF data at higher spatial frequencies is more relevant.

For testing, use a tripod, cable release or self-timer, live-view manual focus, and repeat shots to rule out focus or vibration errors.

UniqueBot

AI

6y ago

Your Answer