How can I tell whether missing images on ADOX CHS 25 negatives are from emulsion wash-off or a processing issue?

Asked 12/7/2021

4 views

2 answers

0

I developed an old roll of 35mm ADOX CHS 25 / EFKE 25 exposed around 2008–2011. Storage was not ideal. I processed it at 20°C in a Diafine-type developer and used a non-hardening fixer. After washing, only the last 6–7 frames showed images; frames 1–29 were blank, with no edge markings in that section. The leader was black as expected, and one visible frame has a wavy area where part of the image is missing.

ADOX recommends a hardening fixer for this film, and I have ordered hardener that can be used before development or in the stop bath. Before I process the remaining rolls, how can I determine whether the emulsion actually washed off versus another cause such as handling or reel-loading damage? If hardener is used before development, are there downsides?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

4y ago

2 Answers

3

If the emulsion were to “wash off”, you would see definite changes to the thickness and likely the termination line would show some folding of the emulsion. Because the leader is black meaning it developed properly along with several other frames, most likely, the damage is do to improper loading of the film on the reel.

Additionally, the edge printing is placed on the film using light. In other words, this printing is exposed film that develops up just like a camera exposed image. Examine the film in detail using a magnifier. Examine the film by transmitted light (looking through the film) and by reflected light. You do this by holding the near a lamp and twist the film, looking at its surface. If the emulsion has been stripped off, you will see differences in the coating thickness seen by reflected light from its surface.

A hardener works on the gelatin that is the binder for the light sensitive goodies (salts of silver). A hardener changes the infusion rate (time it takes for the developer which is mainly water to percolate into the emulsion structure. Thus, a hardener will retard the developing action. This is critical if the developing time is short, just a few minutes. If the developing time is over 5 minutes, likely you will see no applicable effect from using a hardener. Generally, a hardener is used when films are not pre-hardened and in hot weather processing. Likely not applicable in this case.

I would develop another test roll. This time double check reel loading. I won’t hurt to make a test roll using fresh film. Reel loading can be daunting.

P.S. Your film from 2008 is not that old, it should be OK!

Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user44949

4y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

If the emulsion had truly washed off, you should be able to see physical evidence on the film: changes in coating thickness, a visible boundary where material is missing, or disturbed/folded emulsion at the edge of the affected area. Check the strip carefully with a magnifier in both transmitted light and reflected light while tilting it near a lamp.

A key clue is that the edge printing is also made by exposure and develops like the picture image. Since the blank section has no edge markings, that points away from normal camera exposure problems and more toward a processing issue affecting development on that part of the roll.

Because the leader is fully black and some frames developed, the film was at least capable of developing. Based on the provided evidence, improper loading on the reel or related processing damage is more likely than simple emulsion wash-off from using a non-hardening fixer.

So: inspect the film surface first. If you do not see clear physical loss of emulsion, suspect reel-loading/processing problems rather than storage alone or camera malfunction.

UniqueBot

AI

4y ago

Your Answer