How can I speed up batch RAW processing in Aperture 3?

Asked 1/13/2011

72 views

2 answers

0

I shoot thousands of RAW files on trips, and simple edits like exposure, white balance, sharpening, and color adjustments take a very long time one image at a time. In Aperture 3, what workflow helps speed this up? For example, do you first reject weak shots, use star ratings to narrow down the keepers, or use Lift & Stamp for similar images? What batch-processing approach works best without spending hours on every photo?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

6

I do a first quick pass looking for anything decent, even stuff that looks bad but can be possibly saved - I rate this all as one star.

Then I work through those, quickly flipping through them and editing anything that interests me. Those I rate as two.

After that I review all of the two stars and see if there's anything that really stands out, that is worthy of more attention - those I rate as three or higher depending on what I got.

I do sometimes lift and stamp changes, mostly around white balance and metadata (don't forget to add yourself as the creator and a copyright notice to all images if you didn't do it at import!). Sharpening I tend to like to only add to specific areas, if at all.

I have also had Viveza 2 and the other Nik products for a while but only recently started using that more. A separate tip for that is that I like to use Viveza 2 first to alter tones in an image (spotlight certain things, fill or darken areas as needed). Then I duplicate that version and use ColorEFX and/or Nik Sharpening (SharpenPro) against the duplicate version, so I have three masters when I'm all done - but since you can't undo ColorEFX and SharpenPro, I like to have the "clean" Viveza image there to re-work from as a base (and that will also work out well if you need to upsample for larger prints and thus have to re-sharpen). I also like to append to the second and third created master version names with the tool that helped to edit them (-VZ for Viveza, -CFX for ColorFX) but that might be placed better elsewhere since export to Flickr will change your version names.

ADDITION:

I'm adding one more thing. Go back into your photos a week or so later, and do one pass through. Especially if you have a lot of photos you can start to get more and more critical, or perhaps single-minded... in any case it always seems like looking back through images later one, I find at least one that I really love that makes me wonder why I left it down in the low-rating dungeon.

Originally by user1192. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1192

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

A good Aperture 3 workflow is to edit fewer images, not process everything equally.

Start with a fast first pass and reject obvious failures: out-of-focus shots, accidental frames, bad exposures, duplicates, etc. Then rate what remains so you can focus on the strongest images first. A common approach is:

  • first pass: reject trash, mark possible keepers
  • second pass: promote stronger images
  • final pass: spend real editing time only on the best shots

Several users only fully process a small percentage of their total images. That saves the most time.

For similar shots taken under the same light, use Lift & Stamp for things like white balance, exposure, and metadata. That can speed up batches significantly. Metadata is especially worth applying consistently, such as creator and copyright info.

Be selective with sharpening. It often makes more sense to sharpen at export time for JPEGs, printing, or web use, rather than applying it broadly to every RAW file. Some photographers also prefer sharpening only specific areas instead of globally.

In short: cull aggressively, rate consistently, edit the best images first, and batch-apply only the adjustments that truly carry across similar photos.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer