How can I recreate this portrait look with soft light, shallow depth of field, and teal-toned grading?

Asked 4/30/2017

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m trying to understand how to recreate a portrait style similar to Charles Hildreth’s work, specifically the exposure, color treatment, and overall finish rather than composition. In the examples I’m looking at, the backgrounds often have a cool teal cast while skin tones and eyes stay more natural, and there’s also a noticeable matte/low-contrast finish.

What lighting setup is likely being used for this kind of portrait? How important is the light quality compared with the post-processing? I’d also like to know what role lens choice, background selection, and masking/color grading might play in getting this look.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

11

Is there something important to say about the light in the portraits of Charles?

There is. There is no mastering of light here. It's always diffused natural light, either from an overcast sky or very large windows, with very little shadows. No risk taken, just the very basics and lots of color retouch in post. The catchlights in the eyes here and here show one or two white reflectors on the ground.

It looks to me like regular magazine material, no creativity, just pretty girls. It's easy to reproduce, and easy to forget.

Lens

Buy an expensive bokeh maker, not a lens. That is a 85 mm F/1.4 or perhaps a Canon 85 F/1.2 with a full frame camera.

Location

Choose a background color contrasting with your model hair color, playing with complementary colors, and enhance them (too much) in post.

Retouch

I'm sorry to be harsh, but being experienced, I see this kind of pictures every day, it looks always the same and I don't know why someone would like to reproduce it. Right know, just from memory, I can cite Maxim Guselnikov, Sean Archer, Lisa Holloway, Jessica Drossin, Helena Shumilova as copycats of this one. See ? It's crowded. There is nothing to envy, nothing to copy, just big strings. They will vanish with the trend they are following.

You may search your inspiration elsewhere, maybe in museums or on The Art of Photograpy.

Originally by user51051. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user51051

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Based on the answers, the look is mostly built from soft natural light plus strong color work in post.

Likely capture setup:

  • Diffused natural light: overcast daylight or a very large window
  • Very soft shadows, low-contrast lighting
  • Reflectors (possibly white reflectors below/in front) to open shadows and create catchlights
  • A fast portrait lens on full frame, such as an 85mm around f/1.4–f/1.2, for shallow depth of field and smooth background blur

To help the color styling:

  • Pick backgrounds that contrast with the subject’s hair/skin and work with complementary colors
  • Expose cleanly and keep lighting simple; the effect is not mainly from complex lighting

Post-processing clues:

  • Matte effect from lifting blacks / lowering contrast with curves
  • Selective color grading, likely with masking, so cooler tones affect the background/whites more than skin
  • Enhanced background color separation while keeping skin tones relatively natural

So yes, light quality matters, but mainly because soft, even light gives you a clean file that’s easy to grade. The signature feel seems to come less from dramatic lighting and more from lens choice, controlled color relationships, and selective post-processing.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer