How can I fill a missing area of blue sky seamlessly in Photoshop CS5?

Asked 12/18/2010

3 views

2 answers

0

I stitched a panorama from three images and ended up with an empty wedge of sky caused by perspective. Content-Aware Fill doesn't work well here because it pulls in parts of the building, and a simple gradient fill doesn't match the existing variation in the sky. What's a good way in Photoshop CS5 to fill this missing sky area so it blends naturally with the surrounding blue sky?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

5

I'm guessing from your taks you are using Photoshop CS5. Doesn't photoshop CS5 have the nifty content aware deletion tool that works wonder with such things? Here's a tutorial on using it.

Originally by user2692. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2692

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

A practical fix in CS5 is to sample the existing sky and stretch it into the gap, then blend it.

One community solution was:

  1. Select a very thin strip or single row of pixels from a nearby clean area of sky.
  2. Stretch/transform that strip to cover the empty area up to the frame edges.
  3. Use the Spot Healing Brush a few times to break up banding or stretching artifacts and help the fill blend in.

This works better than Content-Aware Fill when the missing area sits close to buildings or other edges, because Content-Aware may pull in unwanted detail. A plain gradient often looks artificial if the sky already has subtle horizontal variation, while stretching real sky pixels preserves the original color and tone better.

If needed, sample from a part of the sky closest in brightness to the gap for the most natural match.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer