How can I fill a missing area of blue sky seamlessly in Photoshop CS5?
Asked 12/18/2010
3 views
2 answers
0
I stitched a panorama from three images and ended up with an empty wedge of sky caused by perspective. Content-Aware Fill doesn't work well here because it pulls in parts of the building, and a simple gradient fill doesn't match the existing variation in the sky. What's a good way in Photoshop CS5 to fill this missing sky area so it blends naturally with the surrounding blue sky?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
5
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A practical fix in CS5 is to sample the existing sky and stretch it into the gap, then blend it.
One community solution was:
- Select a very thin strip or single row of pixels from a nearby clean area of sky.
- Stretch/transform that strip to cover the empty area up to the frame edges.
- Use the Spot Healing Brush a few times to break up banding or stretching artifacts and help the fill blend in.
This works better than Content-Aware Fill when the missing area sits close to buildings or other edges, because Content-Aware may pull in unwanted detail. A plain gradient often looks artificial if the sky already has subtle horizontal variation, while stretching real sky pixels preserves the original color and tone better.
If needed, sample from a part of the sky closest in brightness to the gap for the most natural match.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can I use Photoshop Content-Aware Fill and still keep a RAW/DNG workflow in Lightroom?
How can I remove a localized purple color cast from part of a photo?
How can I extend a photo’s edges to fill a larger canvas in GIMP?
How can I crop away the empty edges after Photomerge in Photoshop?
How do I fill added canvas space with a color in Photoshop?