How can I digitize a very large archive of prints and negatives, including notes on the backs?

Asked 1/8/2011

5 views

2 answers

0

I need to digitize an extremely large family archive—roughly 100,000 printed photos and 100,000 negatives. I’d like to preserve both the image side and any handwritten notes on the backs of prints.

Is there a reasonably priced automatic scanner setup for this, or would separate solutions for prints and negatives make more sense? I’m especially interested in batch/feeder options, but I’m also open to practical advice on whether scanning this volume myself is realistic and how best to preserve the originals in the meantime.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

14

A cheap scanner will take about one minute per negative or photo: that's 3/4 year of full-time work to scan all this stuff, not counting the follow-on postprocessing needed to clean up the scans. If you want to continue living your life, consider shipping this material off to a service, as suggested in a related thread and another and another.

Originally by user1356. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1356

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For an archive this large, doing it yourself with a low-cost scanner is usually not realistic. Community experience suggests cheap scanners can take around a minute per photo or negative, which would make this an enormous long-term project before cleanup and organization.

A practical approach is:

  • For the short term, preserve the originals well: keep prints and negatives cool, dry, and dark.
  • For digitizing, consider a professional scanning service if you want the project finished in a reasonable time.
  • If you scan yourself, expect separate workflows: sheet-fed or flatbed scanning for prints, and a dedicated film scanner for negatives.

For negatives, a dedicated 35mm film scanner with a strip feeder can work well for 135 film. For prints, a flatbed or feeder-based document/photo scanner may help, but scanning both fronts and backs adds time and may require manual handling.

So the key answer is: there likely isn’t a single inexpensive, fully automatic device that will efficiently handle this entire job. Either outsource it, or plan on a very long DIY process with separate print and negative solutions.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer