Have APS-C and smaller camera sensors reached their practical limits?
Asked 5/7/2013
7 views
2 answers
0
Megapixel counts on APS-C, compact, and smartphone sensors seem to have slowed compared with earlier years. For example, many APS-C cameras stayed around 18–24 MP for a while, compact cameras clustered around roughly 16 MP, and many phones remained near 8–13 MP. Has sensor development reached an optical or physical limit for these smaller formats, or have manufacturers simply shifted focus away from more pixels?
I’m mainly wondering whether diffraction, sensor size, and lens limitations mean future image-quality gains will mostly come from other areas such as dynamic range, high-ISO noise, autofocus pixels on sensor, readout speed, color, and image processing rather than major increases in resolution.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
11
Very Unlikely
There is a lot of R&D going on in sensor technology right now, even the examples you give are at best misleading.
You only talk about megapixels, there are a lot of improvements that can be done without increasing the pixel count. For example, just compare pictures from a 8MP cell-phone camera from a new model to a 4 year old model.
APS-C sensors have not plateaued in terms of their megapixel counts - Nikon recently released a 24MP APS-C camera (the D7100)
The 7D 18MP sensor was not updated because the 7D wasn't updated.
On the other hand, the Rebel series 18MP sensor (I don't know if this is the same sensor as the 7D or not) introduced in 2010 with the 550D was updated in 2012 with on-chip phase detection for the 650D (how's that for a 2 years upgrade cycle?)
Sony only started producing back illuminated sensors at consumer prices at 2009
The Nikon D800 with a 36MP sensor was introduced in 2012
So, not only did sensor development not stop, it didn't even slow down. New sensor improvements are released at an amazingly high rate considering the research and manufacturing expenses required.
Originally by user2481. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user2481
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Probably not. Smaller sensors are constrained more by physics than larger ones, but they have not “peaked” in an absolute sense.
The key point is that sensor progress is no longer just about adding megapixels. At higher pixel densities, diffraction and lens quality mean extra resolution brings diminishing visible benefit, especially for normal print sizes. That helps explain why pixel counts on APS-C, compacts, and phones sometimes stabilize.
Manufacturers have instead been improving other areas that often matter more to image quality: low-light performance, noise handling, dynamic range, color accuracy, faster readout, and on-sensor autofocus features. In very small cameras like phones and many compacts, sensor size is a major limiting factor, and lens performance can already be the bottleneck before sensor resolution is.
So the trend is less “we’ve hit the end” and more “the easy gains from more pixels are smaller now.” Future improvements are still likely, but often through better sensor design, supporting electronics, and processing rather than dramatic jumps in megapixel count alone.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why aren’t low-resolution full-frame sensors much cheaper to make?
Is a cropped full-frame image equivalent to a higher-megapixel APS-C image?
Why do some compact cameras have more megapixels than DSLRs?
Should I choose an entry-level APS-C DSLR or a mirrorless/compact camera?
Can small sensors achieve the same wide field of view as full frame?