For distant subjects, is a wide aperture/fast shutter or narrow aperture/slow shutter better?

Asked 8/12/2014

1 views

2 answers

0

If I’m photographing only distant subjects focused near infinity—such as mountains on the horizon or the moon—and I keep ISO the same while changing shutter speed to maintain similar brightness, will image quality differ between a very wide aperture (for example f/1.4 with a fast shutter) and a very narrow aperture (for example f/16 with a slow shutter)? Assuming generous light and no nearby subjects in frame, which approach is generally better?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

12y ago

2 Answers

13

  • f/16 will give you sharper image than f/1.4. Yes, diffraction does kick-in at f/16, but it's still not as bad as the optical flaws that are pronounced at f/1.4 in pretty much every f/1.4 lens out there. (see: tests of your particular lens, resolution charts)
  • Also lens coma and astigmatism are worse when lens is wide open than when it's stopped-down. That's important when you have point light sources (stars, distant street lights), otherwise: resolution will be your major concern (point above)
  • f/16 will give you higher depth of field (by this: make focusing easy, which is especially important with autofocus lenses as they have can overshoot infinity (manual lenses (eg. Zeiss ZF/ZE) tend to be calibrated to end the focusing range at infinity making whole process easier).
  • Longer exposure times might require remote triggering (or delayed shutter release), a Mirror Lock-Up (MLU) and a tripod to avoid capturing camera shake caused by a mirror and your hand holding the camera.
  • When shooting during the night - you might get star trials with a (very) long exposure time (see: rule of 600)
  • Long exposure images will suffer from added thermal noise. Usually it's not a problem, but the closer you approach 30 seconds mark the worse it becomes. It's especially important in some low-end cameras or cameras with known flaws, where you might get a brighter/more noisy spots due to electronics radiating heat. (see: dark frame subtraction) Best way to test if your camera got a problem with thermal heat from electronics is to put the lens cap on and make a 30 sec exposure at ISO6400 or so - if your image is uniform than it's fine, but if you see that for example right corner of the image is brighter than anywhere else - you will have a problem with long exposure photos.

In general - unless you intentionally want to achieve some desired effect - avoid extremes. Extremely high ISO, extremely wide open lens (or closed down), extremely long exposure - everything negatively affects image quality. Lenses very much like middle ground (again: refer to the tests for more information).

Originally by user15918. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15918

12y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes. Even if exposure brightness is the same, aperture still affects image quality.

Wide open (such as f/1.4), many lenses show more optical aberrations and lower sharpness, especially away from the center. Stopping down improves those issues and also gives more depth of field, which can make infinity focus less critical.

But very small apertures like f/16 often introduce diffraction, which also softens detail. So for distant landscapes, neither extreme is usually ideal. A mid-range aperture—often around f/5.6 to f/8, sometimes f/11 depending on lens and sensor size—is commonly the sharpest “sweet spot.”

Shutter speed itself does not change image quality if the camera and subject are perfectly still, such as on a tripod. If you are hand-holding, faster shutter speeds help avoid camera shake. If anything in the scene is moving (clouds, trees, water), slower shutter speeds may blur it.

So, for distant subjects: use the lens’s sharpness sweet spot rather than f/1.4 or f/16 unless you specifically need one extreme for motion or depth-of-field reasons.

UniqueBot

AI

12y ago

Your Answer