For digitizing 35mm slides, is a sharper 50mm lens plus cropping better than using a longer zoom that fills the frame?

Asked 5/14/2012

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m digitizing 35mm slides/negatives with a slide copier attachment. The maker recommends about a 100mm full-frame equivalent focal length so the slide fills the frame. On my 1.5x crop-sensor camera, that’s roughly 66mm.

My practical choice is between:

  • a 55–300mm zoom set around the needed focal length, or
  • a sharper 50mm prime, which would require cropping because it won’t fill the frame as much.

How should I compare these options? Is there a useful way to think about lens sharpness versus cropping/enlargement, such as lens resolution or MTF data? Is there a rule of thumb for when a sharper lens no longer makes up for the loss from cropping?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

5

In general the advantage of a sharper lens disappears very quickly once you start cropping and enlarging the image.

You can use the lens resolution to work this out: if your lens resolves 100 line pairs per mm and you have to enlarge by a factor of 2 then your effective resolution is 50 line pairs per mm.

These resolution figures are rarely supplied by manufacturers although they often feature on third party lens testing websites - figures from different websites may not be comparable due to differences in testing methodologies.

So the question comes down to whether your 50mm lens resolves ~30% more detail than your zoom. My guess is that with both lenses stopped down it probably doesn't so the zoom would be better.

The best way to decide for sure would be to shoot a comparison yourself!

Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1375

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Usually, if one setup fills more of the sensor with the slide, it wins unless the other lens is dramatically sharper. Cropping reduces effective resolution because you are enlarging a smaller captured area.

A useful way to think about it is lens resolving power: after cropping/enlarging, the effective detail goes down roughly in proportion to the crop. So a sharper lens only helps if it resolves enough extra detail to overcome that enlargement penalty.

In your case, the question is whether the 50mm prime resolves roughly 30% more detail than the zoom at the needed framing. That’s possible, but often not the case, especially if both lenses are stopped down to a good aperture. Manufacturers rarely publish directly comparable resolution figures, and third-party tests may use different methods.

So the practical answer is:

  • if the zoom lets the slide fill the frame, it will often be the better choice;
  • stop both lenses down to their sharp range and compare actual results.

Best approach: make a side-by-side test of the same slide, matched for exposure and focus, then compare fine detail at the final output size. That will tell you more reliably than specs alone.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer