Fast ways to cull and compare large batches of RAW photos

Asked 8/29/2011

2 views

2 answers

0

After a shoot, I often come home with 500+ RAW images and need to quickly compare several similar shots before editing. Using Windows Image Viewer is slow because each image can take 1–3 seconds to load.

Is there a faster way to review and compare RAW files, ideally with quick keyboard-based keep/delete or rating workflow? I have Photoshop CS5, but I’m open to other software if it speeds up culling.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source Ā· Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

14

My solution for this was to purchase Lightroom.

My reasoning:

  • Lightroom's workflow is an awesome solution for this problem.
  • It's not too expensive (certainly not cheap either though).
  • It's a one time cost that saves be a lot of time.

Details...

  • Lightroom allows you to run through and flag your images (Yes/No/Unflagged) using keyboard shortcuts, so I take one pass through them and just flag them all, spending no more than 2-3 seconds per image.
  • I then filter them down to only the ones flagged "yes", and take a second pass through, spending maybe 10-15 seconds each and rate them using the 1-5 star range (I rarely set higher than 3 at this point though)
  • I then filter down using the ratings until I have < 20 or so images that I spend some time editing.
  • After I've finished I delete all the ones flagged "no"

This process works extremely well with Lightroom, but would also would work with any program that allows for fast rating/tagging.

Originally by user67. Source Ā· Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user67

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes. A dedicated photo browser/asset manager is much better than Windows Image Viewer for culling RAW files.

Good options mentioned were Lightroom, FastStone Viewer, XnView, and IrfanView. The main speed gain comes from using the RAW file’s embedded JPEG preview instead of fully rendering each RAW every time. In FastStone Viewer, for example, you can set RAW viewing to use the embedded preview image for much faster switching between shots. XnView offers a similar feature, and IrfanView can also browse RAW files with plugins.

If you want a fuller workflow, Lightroom was recommended because it lets you quickly flag, reject, and star-rate images with keyboard shortcuts, then filter down in passes until only your best shots remain for editing.

So the practical answer is: use a dedicated culling program, and if speed is your top priority, enable embedded preview display for RAW files.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer