Does the in-camera sRGB/Adobe RGB setting matter when shooting RAW?

Asked 5/10/2012

7 views

2 answers

0

I shoot RAW all the time and noticed my camera lets me choose either sRGB or Adobe RGB. My RAW converter is set to export sRGB files. Since RAW files store sensor data and color space is normally applied later during processing, I’m wondering whether the in-camera color space setting affects the RAW file at all. Does choosing sRGB vs Adobe RGB matter for anything beyond the embedded preview or histogram? Are there any situations where it changes exposure, metering, or other behavior when shooting RAW?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source Ā· Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

21

The answer is basically the same as this one on white balance and raw. You're right, it doesn't matter at all in how the image is recorded or stored.

As you note, the selected color space applies to the preview image and to the histogram. The camera also may make metering decisions intended to avoid clipping (overexposing to the full saturation point) in particular channels, and that may be affected by choice of color space in-camera. I think this is less likely to be a real problem than having the white balance far off might be, though.

But I'd also take a careful look at the preview image in both modes. The rear LCD screen isn't something you can calibrate on most cameras. I think it's more likely that sRGB is correctly represented, and the screen might not cover the Adobe RGB gamut very well. (And really, I'd not be surprised if many cameras don't really handle preview display of Adobe RGB correctly at all — that's a lot more complicated than simply having the mechanism to save in that space.) I'd do some test shots and see which looks most like what your final printed output does, and then use that — that'll make the review screen more useful. It may very well turn out that an accurate display of sRGB is more like your final results than a bad rendition of Adobe RGB (even if you ultimately do use Adobe RGB in the end).

Originally by user1943. Source Ā· Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1943

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For the RAW data itself, no: the camera’s sRGB/Adobe RGB setting does not change what is recorded in the RAW file. Your understanding is basically correct—color space is applied later in processing, not baked into the RAW capture.

Where it can matter is in camera-generated views of that RAW file, such as:

  • the embedded JPEG preview on the rear LCD
  • the histogram/highlight warnings
  • possibly some metering or clipping-protection behavior based on the preview/rendering

So the setting can affect what the camera shows you, even though it doesn’t alter the underlying RAW data.

In practice, many displays are closer to sRGB than Adobe RGB, so the camera preview may look more reliable in sRGB. But if you process RAW later, you can choose the output color space you want at that stage.

Also, if your goal is maximum editing flexibility, exporting from the RAW converter to a wider-gamut working space can be beneficial before converting to sRGB for web or other output.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer