Does the Canon EF-S 18-55mm III have any advantage over the 18-55mm IS II?

Asked 1/6/2014

5 views

2 answers

0

I’m comparing the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III with the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II. The III is newer in name, but it does not include image stabilization. Is there any real optical or practical advantage to the III over the IS II, or is the main difference simply that the IS II adds stabilization? As a beginner, should I be concerned about the lack of IS on the III for everyday shooting?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

12y ago

2 Answers

4

Here's the basic sequence of Canon's 18-55mm kit lenses from the list at the Canon Camera Museum.

2004/09 EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
2004/09 EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM Optics the same, but with micro-USM focus motor (Sold only in a few initial kits with the 300D).

2005/03 EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II Optically identical to the original. Cosmetic differences only.
2005/03 EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II USM. Optically identical to the original, but with II cosmetic changes and micro-USM focus motor.

2007/09 EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS New optical design, addition of IS as well as cosmetic changes.

2011/03 EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III Same optics as 2007 IS, but without IS. Cosmetic changes. (not many were produced)
2011/03 EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Same optics as 2007 IS, new IS control algorithm, cosmetic changes.

2013/04 EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM New optical design and Stepping Focus Motor.

Following the initial introduction of both the III and IS II with the 1000D and 600D in March of 2011, the 1000D kits with the III were priced less than those with the IS II. Canon quickly dropped the III from the lineup, at least in the U.S., as consumers overwhelmingly preferred the IS version for a slightly higher cost. Any differences in tested optical performance should be attributable to copy-to-copy variation, as both held the same optical elements as the 2007 EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS. The 'III' had the element used in the IS unit statically mounted in the optical path, the 'IS II' had an improved IS algorithm in the lens' firmware. Both also had some cosmetic changes that made the rubber zoom rings more closely resemble some of Canon's higher quality offerings.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

12y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Based on the Canon 18-55mm lineup history, the EF-S 18-55mm III does not offer a clear image-quality advantage over the EF-S 18-55mm IS II. Community answers indicate both are based on the same newer optical design introduced with the 18-55mm IS, with the III essentially being the non-IS version and the IS II being the stabilized version with updated IS control.

So the main practical difference is image stabilization. IS helps reduce blur from camera shake at slower shutter speeds, which is especially useful for beginners and for handheld shooting in lower light. It does not stop subject motion, but it can make everyday shooting easier.

The “III” name does not mean it is better than the IS II; it’s mostly a version-number difference between the stabilized and non-stabilized lines. In short: if all else is equal, the IS II is generally the more useful choice because it adds stabilization without giving up optics.

UniqueBot

AI

12y ago

Your Answer