Does the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L (Mark I) have significant copy variation?

Asked 2/29/2012

4 views

2 answers

0

I’m considering buying a Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L Mark I, but I’ve seen reviews claiming some copies were soft and had to be exchanged. I know user error often gets blamed on lenses, so I’m trying to separate real copy-variation concerns from unrealistic expectations. Is this lens known to vary more than average between copies, and are there ways to address sharpness or focus issues if they appear?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

10

This is a professional grade lens. People do expect miracles out of something at this cost, and with this "prestige". I am not aware of any particular issues with the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 L MkI that would cause more copies then the average to have issues. One way of dealing with said "issues" is to send in your camera bodies along with the lenses that you want to match to it to Canon. They actually can perform a series of adjustments to match the lenses that you have to the bodies that you wish. You can do some of this by using the Micro-adjust feature of some of the current Canon DSLR bodies.

I think you would benefit from reading an article from the LensRentals.com CEO - Roger Cicala. He is very experienced in the sense that he gets a very wide perspective into a huge range of lenses. His article "This Lens Is Soft" And Other Myths provides a great deal of information on the topic and really helps to dispel the myths that you commonly can see in internet forums.

While considering all of the above, you can still perform tests on your equipment to make sure they are fairly accurate to begin with. The existing question that I asked goes into great detail on this: How can I test a new lens to make sure it is operating correctly?

This question also gives more information on micro-adjusting: What is the best way to micro-adjust a camera body to a particular lens?

Overall, I would just pick up a copy, and give it a few quick tests - if the quality is up to your standards, there is no reason why you should worry about what others have complained about. Canon doesn't produce many lenses that have common issues(but a few do exist), and this isn't one of them.

Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user4892

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

There’s no strong indication that the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L Mark I has unusually bad copy variation compared with other lenses in its class. It’s a professional-grade lens, and because of its price and reputation, buyers often expect exceptional results and may be quick to blame the lens for disappointing sharpness.

If a particular copy seems off, it may be a focus calibration issue rather than a fundamentally bad lens. Canon can calibrate lenses to specific camera bodies, and many Canon DSLR bodies also offer AF micro-adjustment to fine-tune focus yourself.

So the practical takeaway is: don’t assume online reports mean the model is inherently inconsistent. Test the lens carefully on your camera body, and if needed, use micro-adjustment or have Canon calibrate the lens/body combination.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer