Can you use Canon EF lenses effectively on a Sony a6000 with an EF-to-E adapter?
Asked 1/22/2016
2 views
2 answers
0
I want to use Canon EF lenses on a Sony a6000, specifically the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II and EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II. Do EF-to-Sony E adapters work well in terms of image quality, autofocus, and handling? Are there any drawbacks I should know about before buying one?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
3
Other answers have already said what I'd have said, apart from the fact that the only reason I'd use one of these adapters is if I had Canon lenses and you want IS. Having IS is arguably the most useful advantage these adapters offer, as shooting with adapted lenses with dumb adapters is quite simple.
I'm looking to use my husbands EF 24-70 f2.8 II and EF 70-200 f2.8 USM IS II on the Sony a6000.
I'm sure you must know this, but for general information, note that the size and weight of these lenses is significant and, if you do this, mount the lenses on a tripod or monopod and do not rely on the Sony's mount being strong enough to support these lenses.
Using these lenses on a DSLR is less of a problem for handling and balance, but on a small camera like the A6000 it just feels weird in my experience. YMMV.
Originally by user46861. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user46861
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—Canon EF lenses can be used on a Sony a6000 with an EF-to-E smart adapter, and image quality should remain good because the adapter mainly preserves the correct flange distance and electronic communication. Reported tradeoffs are mostly about autofocus and handling, not optical quality.
From the community feedback, adapters such as Metabones, FotodioX, and Viltrox can work, with Metabones generally seen as the higher-quality option. The main downside is autofocus speed: these setups are typically much slower than native Sony E-mount lenses, so they’re better suited to portraits, landscapes, and other slower-paced shooting than sports or action.
Another practical issue is size and balance. The EF 24-70mm f/2.8 and especially the 70-200mm f/2.8 are large, heavy lenses for a small a6000 body. For support, mount the lens—not the camera—on a tripod or monopod when possible, especially with the 70-200mm.
A smart adapter can also let you retain features like lens stabilization, which is one of the biggest benefits over a simple “dumb” adapter.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I tell whether a zoom lens is parfocal, and are these Canon and Sigma zooms parfocal?
How much better are Canon Mark II L lenses than the original versions?
Can Canon EF and Tamron EF-mount lenses work on a Sony A7R with autofocus and stabilization?
Will switching from a Nikon D750 to a Canon 5D Mark IV improve sharpness or color for family portraits?
Which is better for convention photography: Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II or 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II?