Does shutter speed affect flash exposure, and is “speed of light” the wrong term?
Asked 12/1/2013
3 views
2 answers
0
In a flash-photography explanation, the author wrote that changing shutter speed didn’t affect the subject exposure because “the speed of light is faster than any shutter speed,” and that only the aperture determined the exposure from the flash. Is that wording technically wrong? Did he likely mean the short duration of the flash pulse instead? Also, when people say aperture determines flash exposure, what is that contrasted with?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
12y ago
2 Answers
5
(1.) I agree that he was probably trying to convey "the duration of the light 'pulse' from the flash" when he said "the speed of light.
As the light pulse is of short duration it will, in all cases when the shutter is fully open, have a duration shorter than the minimum possible opening time. This was not true of ye olde magnesium based flash bulbs which had a duration closer to the fully open shutter times of modern roller blind shutters.
Note that the phrases above - "when the shutter is fully open" and "roller blind shutter" are both relevant to this answer. Most SLRs and DSLRs have roller blind shutters which are only ever fully open below some relatively low speed - mayne in the 1/120s - 1/250s range. Firing a flash when they are not fully open will result in a flash illuminated area with dark areas on one or both sides. A focal plane shutter tends to be much faster - in some cases faster than 1/1000s, but these are essentially only ever found on old or specialist cameras.
(2.) Expand statement along the lines - "It was only the amount of light let into the lens from the burst produced by the flash that determined the exposure - not the time that the shutter was opened for as this was far longer than the time taken for the flash burst, but there was no other light received before or after the burst.
Originally by user6263. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user6263
12y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—the wording is technically sloppy. “Shutter speed” is really a time interval, not a speed, so comparing it to the speed of light is not precise. What the author likely meant is that a flash emits a very short pulse of light, and when the shutter is fully open that pulse is usually much shorter than the exposure time.
In that situation, changing shutter speed generally does not change the flash-lit subject exposure; aperture does. The contrast is with shutter speed, which mainly affects the ambient light recorded during the exposure.
There is an important caveat: this applies only when the shutter is fully open during the flash. With many focal-plane (“roller blind”) shutters, that is only true up to the camera’s flash sync speed (often around 1/120 to 1/250 s). Above sync speed, the shutter is never fully open all at once, so a normal flash can cause partial illumination across the frame.
So the practical idea is right: below sync speed, flash exposure is mainly controlled by aperture, while shutter speed mostly controls ambient light. The phrase “speed of light” was just an imprecise way of expressing it.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI12y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can aperture change the fill flash-to-ambient ratio, or is it controlled only by shutter speed?
Why does a light meter sometimes give an aperture reading instead of a shutter speed?
Are there commercial high-speed cameras with sub-microsecond exposure times?
Does shutter speed affect flash exposure when using high-speed sync (HSS)?
Why can’t a normal flash exceed X-sync just by staying on during shutter travel?