Does selecting sRGB or Adobe RGB in-camera affect the RAW file?

Asked 2/27/2016

3 views

2 answers

0

I shoot RAW (NEF) on a Nikon and noticed that the camera’s selected color space is recorded in the metadata. A course instructor claimed that choosing Adobe RGB preserves more data in the RAW file than choosing sRGB.

Is the color space actually stored in a RAW file, and if so does it change the RAW sensor data at all? Why would the setting appear in EXIF if it doesn’t affect the RAW image itself?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

6

Part of this question basically seems to be asking if the answers to the other question are actually right. For that part, don't worry — they are. (And no information is lost in this way — the leader of your course is wrong. *)

The other parts of the question basically ask if (and why) this information is stored at all, if it doesn't affect the raw data.

The answer is: like many camera settings other than the fundamental exposure factors (shutter speed, aperture, and sensor gain/iso), the color space selected is stored as advisory information, so that you can make choices in-camera and have them reflected as defaults in RAW processing software. This might not make a lot of sense with color space, but consider tone curves (or even black and white mode), white balance, and even crop. None of this is baked into or affects the basic RAW data itself, but all can be useful to have later.

Keep in mind that Adobe RGB is not strictly better than sRGB — that's a common myth. This is especially true in 8-bit images, like JPEGs. See What's the difference between Adobe RGB and sRGB and which should I set in my camera? for more — but, again, don't worry about it when using RAW. A greater concern is that your camera's rear LCD (or EVF, in mirrorless) is likely to be calibrated to show sRGB correctly, and using Adobe RBG may actually result in less correspondence between what you see there and what you're actually capturing.


* except possibly with the very minor theoretical effect you might see from possible biased metering, as explained in my answer to that other question.

Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1943

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

No—choosing sRGB vs Adobe RGB in-camera does not change the RAW sensor data, so it does not cause more or less data loss in the RAW file. Your instructor’s claim is incorrect.

What is stored is typically metadata/advisory information, along with the embedded JPEG preview the camera includes in the RAW file. That setting can be used by the camera or RAW software as a default when rendering the preview or initial conversion.

This is similar to other in-camera settings such as white balance, picture style, black-and-white mode, tone curves, or crop: they may be recorded in the RAW file’s metadata, but they do not alter the underlying RAW capture itself.

Color space matters when the RAW data is rendered into a viewable image (JPEG, TIFF, etc.), not at the stage of untouched RAW sensor data. In short:

  • RAW data: unaffected by sRGB/Adobe RGB selection
  • Metadata/preview: may reflect the selected color space
  • Final converted image: color space choice matters there, not in the RAW capture

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer