Do Pentax flash bracket adapters preserve full P-TTL features, and is it worth it for reducing red-eye?
Asked 10/5/2011
1 views
2 answers
0
I use a Pentax K-r with a Metz 50 AF-1 and want to reduce red-eye by moving the flash off the camera with a bracket. I know I can mount the flash on a bracket and trigger it wirelessly or off-camera, but that may lose some camera-to-flash communication such as aperture/ISO data, auto zoom, high-speed sync, and possibly rear-curtain sync.
If I use Pentax's dedicated accessories — Hot Shoe Adapter F, Off-Camera Shoe Adapter F, and Short Extension Cord F5P — will that preserve full P-TTL communication and features like auto flash zoom, HSS, and rear-curtain sync?
More generally, when is a simpler off-camera setup acceptable, and when is it worth paying extra for the dedicated Pentax P-TTL bracket/cord solution?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
3
I haven't used those accessories, but that's exactly what they seem to be designed for.
Avoiding direct light on optical axis in favor of bounced or further off-camera flash (triggered optically or with the longer cord, haven't yet seen any P-TTL capable radio triggers) might give you more pleasing results. For these cases, you'll probably want to take manual control over flash zoom. Unfortunately Metz flashes are quite stubborn to turn the Auto Zoom back on after a while.
But, as you say in your comments, bouncing is not always feasible and setting up off-camera flash or using red eye reduction takes too much time for live action. In such situations, I have simulated the telescoping bracket by shooting with one hand and holding the flash out in left hand, but it's too easy to tilt camera this way, so having the bracket seems tempting.
Originally by user4390. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4390
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Those Pentax adapters/cables are intended to maintain the normal hot-shoe communication off-camera, so they should preserve P-TTL functionality and the related features that depend on that connection.
A simpler bracket or optical wireless setup can still work fine if your main goal is just to move the flash away from the lens axis to reduce red-eye. That can be acceptable when you don’t need every automated feature and are comfortable giving up some convenience or controlling things manually.
In practice, the extra functionality is most useful when you need fast, reliable shooting in changing conditions and want the flash to behave much like it does on-camera. If you’re shooting live action and don’t have time to set up bounced or more elaborate off-camera lighting, a bracket with a proper TTL cord can be a practical solution.
That said, moving the flash farther off-axis or bouncing it often gives more pleasing light than simply raising it a little on a bracket, when those options are feasible.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can I use third-party flashes and off-camera cables with a Nikon DSLR?
Can a manual flash be used for rear-curtain sync?
Are there radio flash triggers that support Pentax P-TTL?
Can a Metz 58 AF-1 use manual flash power with rear-curtain sync on Pentax bodies and manual lenses?
How do I switch a Nikon Z7 and SB-300 from i-TTL Balanced Fill to standard i-TTL?