Do lens sharpness and aperture limit how much benefit you get from more megapixels?

Asked 1/14/2012

2 views

2 answers

0

I’ve read that some lenses don’t really take advantage of higher-resolution sensors, so with a lens like the Nikkor 16-85mm VR you might not gain much by shooting at 16MP instead of 9MP. Is that true, and if so, what does “better” mean here—more sharpness, less blur, less noise, or something else?

I’ve also heard that stopping a lens down can improve image quality enough that a higher-megapixel sensor gives similar results to a lower-megapixel sensor shot at a wider aperture. How do lens resolving power, sensor resolution, and aperture interact?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

6

The lens is in front of the sensor, so the sensor cannot get any more details than the lens lets through. That is why if your lens is of poor quality, your images appear blurry.

Now, it is never better to shoot at a lower resolution because the lens resolves a fixed amount of details in a given state (focal-length, aperture and focus-distance). At worst, you will have exactly the same amount of details, just sampled at a lower resolution. When viewed at 100%, it will look less blurry, yes, but you would not be comparing the same image size. Now, you can decide to save memory and bandwidth if you only need smaller images and that is OK.

The higher the resolution of your camera, the more demanding it is of lenses in order to take advantage of the full resolution. You will often see this comment DPReview's review conclusions.

Given that sharpness of a lens is very depending on all its settings and even spatially variant (corners are rarely as sharp so the center), I would not recommend lowering the resolution. In general, a lens gets sharper as the aperture is stopped down, up to its maximum sharpness and then sharpness gets reduced when the diffraction limit is hit. How much very much depends on the lens. High quality lenses for example may be only a tiny bit softer wide-open while low quality lenses can become extremely blurry. So, if your photos are too soft, you can try to stop down, usually 2 stops from the maximum is the rule of thumb.

Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1620

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

A lens limits the detail that reaches the sensor, so a higher-megapixel sensor only helps if the lens, focus, and shooting conditions can deliver that detail. But it is usually not “better” to shoot at a lower resolution in-camera. The lens resolves whatever detail it can; a lower-resolution file just samples that same image more coarsely. At the same output size, the higher-resolution capture is typically at least as good, and often better.

Why people say some lenses “don’t support” high resolution: higher-resolution sensors reveal lens weaknesses more clearly. A softer lens may not let you realize the full benefit of extra pixels, but it does not mean extra pixels make the image worse.

Aperture matters because many lenses are softer wide open and get sharper when stopped down a bit, so more sensor resolution may become more useful there. However, stopping down too far introduces diffraction, which reduces fine detail. So there is usually a sweet spot, not a simple rule that “higher f-number plus more MP equals the same quality.”

In short: more megapixels do not create detail the lens cannot resolve, but they generally do not hurt either; they just demand more from the lens.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer