Do I need to take multiple shots of a static scene to get one sharp photo?
Asked 2/6/2014
4 views
2 answers
0
I used to take two or three photos of the same scene because with a point-and-shoot I often got blur. I now use a Sony NEX-5R and, for static subjects like landscapes, I also use a tripod or Gorillapod, a self-timer, and sometimes a remote release to reduce camera shake.
If the scene is not changing, is it still normal or worthwhile to take multiple identical shots just to make sure one is sharp? Or does needing to do that suggest I should improve my technique or settings instead?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
12y ago
2 Answers
5
Shooting multiple shots like this is certainly common, but it's not optimal. As your skills improve, you'd like to see your consistency improve, too. Shooting digitally, we're lucky that multiple shots cost next to nothing for us, but you want to move away from using that as a crutch.
Instead, try to understand why you're seeing variation from shot-to-shot, and then give thought to whether this is something you can address proactively. It sounds like you've taken steps to stabilize the camera, which certainly helps in some scenarios. In other cases, though (a moving subject, for instance), stabilizing the camera won't help you too much. Finding the right combination of aperture, shutter speed, and ISO settings is a journey itself, as it will vary from one setting to the next.
Your performance as a photographer will improve markedly as you learn to manage these settings rather than to hope that one of a set of shots gets it right. You're clearly moving in the right direction -- keep it up! Over time, your consistency will improve, and you'll find yourself working on artistic aspects of your shots more than technical aspects.
As AJ mentioned, there may still be settings where you want multiple shots to capture a facial expression or an action sequence. You might also find yourself dialing down shutter speed for something like a panning shot which can bump your "reject" rate again while you learn techniques for successful panning. In these cases, though, you'll be shooting multiple shots deliberately for a good reason -- not just out of habit.
Originally by user269. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user269
12y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For a truly static scene, you generally should not need 2–3 identical shots just to get one sharp frame. If the camera and subject are both still, results should be consistent once focus and exposure are correct.
Taking extra frames is common in digital photography because it costs little, but it’s better to treat it as a backup than a crutch. If one frame is sharp and another isn’t, the likely causes are camera shake, subject movement, or settings that are too slow for the conditions.
Your tripod, timer, and remote release are all good ways to reduce shake. For static scenes, one shot is often enough if you’ve set things up properly. It’s also normal to take another shot after reviewing the image and adjusting settings.
For moving subjects, low light, or handheld shooting, multiple frames are much more useful, since small movements can make one image better than another.
A good habit is to review the photo on the LCD and zoom in to check sharpness and focus. If it looks good, there’s no real need to keep taking identical frames. If not, correct the cause and try again.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI12y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Would a heavier Gorillapod reduce shake when using a Sony NEX-5R in low light?
What do you give up by using a GorillaPod instead of a traditional tripod?
Can a Canon EOS 5D Mark II shoot a burst while using the self-timer?
Can the Nikon D5600 stay in self-timer mode for multiple shots?
Can a Canon EOS 77D re-focus when using the self-timer for group or self-portraits?