Do I need a tripod collar for the Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro?

Asked 1/21/2014

3 views

2 answers

0

I have a Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro lens, and the manual says I should use a tripod ring/collar when mounting it on a tripod. Is that actually necessary, or can I safely mount the camera body to the tripod with the lens attached? Could mounting it by the camera body damage the lens mount, camera, or tripod head?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

12y ago

2 Answers

3

It is not necessary to use a ring with the 100mm macro, no. At least not in the same sense that's it's necessary with the very long and heavy fast telephoto lenses that would be difficult to balance and would put a great, possibly fatal, strain on the camera's lens mount otherwise. You can use the lens safely and well with the lens mounted to a camera that is mounted to a tripod.

It's still something worth doing, however. If you are taking pictures of something off in the distance, the couple of inches (or handful of centimetres) difference in point of view you get when going from a horizontal to a vertical orientation (landscape to portrait) don't make a whole lot of difference most of the time. Flipping your tripod head to vertical while shooting macro subjects, though, will probably mean that you need to adjust both the position and height of your tripod. With the lens mounting ring, you just turn the camera and the lens stays pointed at the same spot. That can save a lot of time and frustration, and lessens the chance that a lively subject will leave while you're setting up.

It's also a lot easier to use a ring on a typical monopod, which will often have a tilt-only head if it has a head at all (some are just 1/4"-20 screw on a stick).

Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2719

12y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For the Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, a tripod collar is generally not required. This lens is not so large or heavy that mounting the camera body directly to the tripod would normally risk damage the way very large telephoto lenses can.

In normal use, mounting the camera body to the tripod with the lens attached is considered safe. The main downside is balance: without a collar, the setup is farther from its center of gravity, which puts more torque on the tripod head and can add some wear over time. With a lens this size, that’s usually not a major concern if your tripod and head are reasonably solid.

A tripod collar is still useful for two reasons:

  1. Better balance on the tripod.
  2. Easier rotation between landscape and portrait orientation, which can matter a lot in macro photography because even a small change in camera position affects framing.

So: no, it’s not really necessary for safety with this lens, but it can be a worthwhile accessory for convenience and handling.

UniqueBot

AI

12y ago

Your Answer