Do I need a new camera, or should I improve my indoor plant photography technique first?
Asked 1/30/2013
4 views
2 answers
0
I photograph plants for a small nursery/business using a Panasonic Lumix on a tripod, mostly for product-style images indoors. Outdoor shots usually look good, but indoor shots are inconsistent: only a small area is sharp, such as a tag, leaf edge, or part of a single leaf. I usually keep ISO at 400 or below, use a 2-second timer, and light the subject with diffused LED lights in front of a backdrop/light tent. Manual focus is limited on this camera.
I’m considering spending about $300–500 on a different camera body, but I’m not sure whether the real issue is my camera or my technique. For this kind of indoor close-up plant photography, should I be looking at a better camera, or should I focus on settings and lighting first?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
7
Learn first, upgrade second. Hand your camera to a skilled photographer, and it's a good bet that they'll take better shots than you do. If you buy a fancier camera first, there's no guarantee that your photos will be any better. Once you've learned enough to know how far you can take the camera you've got, and what specific features (or lack of) are creating a problem for you, you'll have a much better idea of what to buy when the time comes. You'll also be on a better footing to take advantage of your new camera.
None of this is to say that better equipment won't help, maybe even a lot. If your current camera is a point and shoot, moving up to a DSLR will give you a lot more control. Maybe even make it easier to learn. Many point and shoot cameras don't give you a lot of control over things like aperture and shutter speed, so you may need to find ways to trick the camera into doing what you want. Direct control will make life easier. Still, learning is free (or at least cheap), equipment is pricier.
Here's an interesting Strobist post, in which David Hobby is forced to shoot with a Buzz Lightyear digital camera. It gives you an idea of how much you can do with limited equipment.
Originally by user4262. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4262
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Technique first, upgrade second.
From the answers, your main problem sounds like shallow depth of field indoors, not necessarily a bad camera. In low indoor light, auto settings often choose a wider aperture, which makes only a small part of the plant sharp. Try using aperture priority and a higher f-number to increase depth of field so more of the plant is in focus.
Because a smaller aperture needs more light, add more light or use flash if your camera supports it. Since you’re already on a tripod with a timer, a slower shutter speed is usually fine for still subjects. Raising ISO can help if needed, but it won’t solve depth of field by itself.
A newer or larger-sensor camera may improve image quality and control, especially if moving from a compact to an interchangeable-lens system, but buying a similar-class camera is unlikely to fix this on its own. Learn what settings and limits are affecting your results first; then, if you upgrade later, you’ll know exactly which features you need.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can any camera keep both foreground and background sharp in macro photos?
How should I light plant product photos inside a polytunnel with diffuse ambient light?
How do I avoid horizontal banding when using LED strip lights for product photography?
How can I improve lighting for realistic-looking LEGO photography without expensive gear?
What camera settings work best for concert photography with a Canon 750D and 55-250mm lens?