Do higher-megapixel sensors still help once diffraction starts reducing sharpness?

Asked 2/27/2013

1 views

2 answers

0

On a given sensor size, increasing pixel density means diffraction becomes visible at wider apertures. If diffraction is already softening the image, does a higher-resolution sensor still provide any real benefit, or is there a point where extra pixels no longer improve detail? More broadly, why do camera makers keep increasing resolution if that seems to trade away small-aperture sharpness instead of focusing on things like noise performance?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

6

The "diffraction limit", i.e. the f-number at which diffraction begins to reduce image sharpness does indeed decrease as pixel density increases (for a fixed size sensor).

However is not true that resolving power cannot increase past the diffraction limit, just that it will increase by ever smaller amounts, in a situation knowns as diminishing returns.

When shooting at an f-stop that is so far past the limit that the increases are negligible then there is no benefit to increasing resolution (for that f-stop), all else being equal. However in the real world things are never equal so there may be advantages to higher pixel counts when it comes to reducing noise.


Many have claimed diffraction will put an end to the "megapixel race". It will, of course, but not as quickly as some realize. We are still seeing real benefits with APS-C sensors containing 24 megapixels. That equates to a full frame sensor with 54MP, far more than the 'diffraction limited' D800 with 36MP. I predict pixel counts to rise past this level, topping out when diffraction is having a noticeable effect at f/5.6, which is probably 100-200MP for a full frame sensor.

Diffraction is still the ultimate limit to detail however, there's really no escape. Moving to medium or large format wont let you bypass the limit - it's tempting to think so given the larger pixels of the equivalent resolution sensor. But with a larger sensor narrower apertures are required to get the same depth of field, and faster lenses are rarer for large formats.

Using a wider aperture is the only solution, but that too runs into problems as it reduces depth of field, causing large amounts of the image to be out of focus which very quickly limits detail.

The only option then is to reduce your focal length. This results in a smaller entrance pupil for the same f-stop, meaning your depth of field is larger for the same diffraction limit. However chasing this parameter eventually leads you into difficulties again, as focal lengths get shorter, maximum apertures start getting smaller again and detail is limited by standard optical aberrations, unless some advance is made in lens design and materials.

Panoramic multi exposure images will therefore be the future of high resolution. By bracketing focus they can escape the depth of field limits, and by using many images taken from longer focal lengths they can escape a lot of the aberrations present in wide angle lenses.

Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1375

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—up to a point. On the same sensor size, higher pixel density makes diffraction effects show up sooner, but that does not mean detail stops improving as soon as you pass a so-called diffraction limit. It means gains become progressively smaller: a diminishing-returns situation.

So at moderately diffraction-limited apertures, a higher-resolution sensor can still record a bit more detail than a lower-resolution one. Only when you stop down far enough that diffraction dominates strongly do extra pixels become effectively useless for resolving more detail at that aperture.

Also, diffraction is only one part of image quality. In practice, real cameras are not equal in every other way, and higher pixel counts can still bring benefits such as flexibility in output and, depending on the full sensor design and processing, possible noise advantages when images are compared at the same final size.

That is why manufacturers keep raising resolution: diffraction does not create a hard wall, only a gradual limit. More megapixels may still help in many shooting conditions, even if the benefit shrinks at smaller apertures.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer