Do external battery packs make speedlights recycle faster than they can safely shoot before overheating?
Asked 8/28/2015
5 views
2 answers
0
I’m trying to understand whether an external power source meaningfully improves real-world speedlight performance, or whether thermal limits usually become the bottleneck first.
With Gen-2 Eneloop AAs, my flashes recycle in a couple of seconds at full power, but I suspect that if they could recycle much faster, they might overheat after only a limited number of shots. In practice I avoid this by using more powerful speedlights at around 1/8 power, where they can keep up with a 12 fps camera and rarely overheat.
So in general:
- How much faster can a speedlight recycle when powered by the best external/internal power options?
- How long can it sustain maximum-speed full-power firing before thermal protection or overheating becomes the limit?
I realize this probably varies by flash model, but I’m looking for the general relationship between recycle speed and heat limits.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
1
Unfortunately this is very difficult to answer.
I imagine this would be something like a table showing full-power cycle speed for each power source along with the number sequential full-power shots at that speed before hitting thermal limit.)
There is no table that can be found or created to display this kind of information, on a general scale. This is because of the specification and construction for every flash is completely different. The materials, quality and circuit type of a flash can greatly affect and change the number of possible shots before overheat.
In regards to buying the highest power flash, the most powerful guide number flash that I'm aware of is GN60/GN58 (at ISO 100) which is held by the the flagship Canon/Nikon flashes.

You might find that something like a Metz flash or a Godox Wistro might have more power, however as a consequence you sacrifice size and portability.

Just because you have a higher power flash dosen't necessarily mean that you can shoot at certain power levels for longer. This is a direct consequence of how the flash is designed to dissipate heat and channel the flash's power.
I would suggest that you try renting/borrowing several different flashes from various manufacturers and then comparing their performance.
You could of course try a more creative DIY approach which would involve adding external heatsinks and increased airflow in order to reduce the heat of the flash.
At that level even on internal batteries they can keep up with my 12fps body, and I almost never overheat.
By using the internal batteries of the flash,you are limiting the possible recharge speed of the flash. This will slow the flash down and not allow it to keep up with your 12fps body.
Can a speedlight work significantly faster than on its internal batteries without overheating?
Theoretically a flash can work indefinitely if the optimal power level is found. Aka you have found the balance between the flashes power and heat created.
A worthy note is that continuous lighting can be incredibly effective. Especially when using lights that utilise LEDs.
Originally by user39420. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user39420
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
There isn’t a universal chart for this. Recycle speed and overheat behavior depend heavily on the specific flash design: tube, circuitry, materials, cooling, and thermal protection vary a lot between models.
An external battery pack can reduce recycle time, but that does not mean the flash can sustain that pace for long at full power. Faster recycling usually makes it easier to hit the flash’s thermal limit sooner, because the flash tube and internal electronics are being stressed more frequently.
So the practical bottleneck is often heat, not battery power.
The one test data point provided shows how model-dependent this is: one Sony unit managed about 39 full-power pops at roughly 0.875 s recycle on Eneloop AAs, while a Neewer TT660 II managed about 60 pops at roughly 2.25 s recycle before the test stopped. That illustrates that different flashes behave very differently even before comparing external packs.
Your current approach is sound: use a more powerful flash at lower power settings when you need sustained bursts. Lower power dramatically reduces recycle demand and heat buildup, which is why it keeps up better with high frame rates.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should I get a Canon CP-E4 or a Quantum battery pack to speed up 580EX II flash recycle time?
Does studio strobe flash tube size affect power, heat, or lifespan?
How can I shorten the Nikon D5200 pop-up flash recycle time?
What frame interval can a Canon T5i sustain for long time-lapse shooting?
Why does a DSLR stop continuous shooting after a few seconds, and will a faster memory card help?