Could 35mm film be developed privately within hours in the late 1920s?
Asked 6/22/2019
4 views
2 answers
0
For fiction research: if someone in the late 1920s or around 1930 had exposed a roll in a camera such as a Leica or similar 35mm camera, could they develop it quickly in a makeshift darkroom or daylight tank to see the images the same day? What would have been the fastest practical method at that time?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
21
My antique wooden Kodak™ day-light loader (ca. 1905) was made with a removable spool of thin (now quite brittle) perforated celluloid with raised rubber edges. The film was sandwiched between the layers of the roll.
The celluloid strip was wide enough to accommodate all sizes from miniature to very wide 128 (2½" wide!).
The roll of film was wound inside the roll of celluloid and the assembly was put/dropped into a galvanized can (tank) to be developed. The holes in the celluloid allowed the liquids to quickly enter and drain to make development more even and precisely timed which was a big deal.
The lid could be put on so lights could be on during the development of the film. Today's daylight loading tanks work exactly the same way as daylight tanks did back in the day.
A normal darkroom session would be an hour or two. When I worked in news for a large broadcast company, we had faster techniques for rapid image access such as hot processing and one solution developer/fixer which could produce "useable" images on our way from the airport to the TV station.
Originally by user21789. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user21789
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes. By the late 1920s, black-and-white film could be developed privately the same day, and in a hurry it could be done within hours rather than days.
The practical method would be much like black-and-white processing today: load the exposed film into a tank or daylight-loading tank in darkness, then run it through developer, a brief stop bath, and fixer, followed by washing and drying. Daylight tanks already existed, so once the film was loaded, the rest could be done with the lights on.
Typical negative development was on the order of about 10 minutes, with only seconds in stop bath and a few minutes in fixer. The slowest part for actually viewing the result would often be washing and drying the negatives enough to inspect or print them.
For 35mm specifically, note that factory preloaded 135 cassettes did not appear until 1934, so in the late 1920s the film would typically be loaded into reusable cassettes from bulk stock. That makes the setup slightly less convenient, but not unrealistic.
So for your story, a private investigator could plausibly improvise a dark space, use a tank process, and get usable negatives the same day—potentially quite quickly if only a first look was needed.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why is only half of my 35mm film developing in the tank?
What causes long streak marks on developed 35mm film after tank processing?
Can you load 35mm film into a developing tank under a red safelight?
What can cause uneven B&W film development in a JOBO tank when a Paterson tank works fine?
Why did only the last frame on my 35mm film roll expose, while all the others were blank?
