Canon EOS Rebel SL3 vs T7i for a first camera: autofocus, image quality, and low light

Asked 10/16/2019

2 views

2 answers

0

I'm choosing between the Canon EOS Rebel SL3 and the Canon EOS Rebel T7i as my first camera. I mainly want to shoot stills in RAW: portraits, kids running around, and occasional sports. Video matters less, and I'd mostly use 1080p.

The main differences I noticed are battery life, processor generation, and autofocus. The T7i has a more advanced viewfinder AF system, while the SL3 adds newer processing and strong live-view autofocus. Since I expect to use the optical viewfinder more as I learn, I'm especially concerned about how much the T7i's autofocus system matters for moving subjects.

My questions are:

  • How do the SL3 and T7i compare for autofocus in stills, live view, and video?
  • Does the SL3's newer processor improve low-light image quality in any meaningful way?
  • Since both cameras seem close overall, which is the better fit for a beginner shooting portraits, children, and occasional sports?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

6y ago

2 Answers

6

To put it in general terms that will be more useful to more readers for a longer period of time:

You're trying to decide between a newer lower tier camera and an older camera from one tier higher up. Which works best for you will still be based in which features are most applicable to the types of photography for which you plan to use the camera. In terms of low light performance, the most important thing is the sensor. How the AF system works in low light will also be a consideration.

  • Both cameras appear to use the same imaging sensor. If it is not the same one, they are near identical in terms of both specs and measured performance. Draw
  • The newer camera has a newer processing chip. There are cameras more advanced than these two that use each of these same chips. It's probably pretty safe to say that neither of these two cameras are utilizing all that each respective chip offers. Since you are planning on saving raw image data, the only difference in image processing will be how the JPEG preview (what you see on the back of the camera when you review the image) will look. It shouldn't affect the raw data collected by what appears to be the same sensor in both cameras. It might affect how fast that data is processed and sent to the memory card, but those other potential differences between the two processors are already reflected in things such as frame rate, buffer depth, shutter lag, etc. Draw
  • The older camera has a far more sophisticated OVF (optical viewfinder) based AF system capable of operating in significantly lower light. 45 vs. 9 total AF points. 45 vs. 1 cross-type AF points. 27 (9 of which continue to operate as cross-type) vs. 0 AF points capable of operating with f/8 lenses or lens/TC combos. Big Advantage: Rebel T7i
  • Both cameras have Dual Pixel CMOS AF in Live View. Draw
  • The older Rebel T7i has an RGB+IR color light meter vs. the newer Rebel SL3's older technology dual layer meter. Advantage: Rebel T7i
  • The older Rebel T7i has a slightly more powerful built-in flash that can act as a "Master" flash in the Canon optical wireless flash system. The newer Rebel SL3 has a slightly weaker flash that is not "Master" capable. Slight advantage: Rebel T7i
  • The older Rebel T7i has an ISO compliant hot shoe that can manually fire any center-pin flash (that doesn't have a trigger voltage that exceeds what the T7i can handle) or flash trigger transmitter. The newer Rebel SL3 has a "borked" hot shoe with no ISO compliant center pin that makes using anything other than dedicated CAnon TTL flashes a pain, if possible at all. Advantage Rebel T7i

Personally, the borked hot shoe would be all it would take for me to forget considering the Rebel SL3 for anything. If you don't ever plan to use any external flash (in other words, if you don't plan on learning how to be a photographer instead of snapshooter) it won't make any difference.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

6y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For image quality, they should be very close. The most important factor in low light is the sensor, and these cameras appear to use the same or extremely similar sensors, so RAW low-light performance is unlikely to differ much. The newer processor in the SL3 is not expected to make a major difference in image quality for your use.

The more meaningful difference is autofocus behavior. If you plan to use the optical viewfinder for stills, the T7i’s more advanced AF system is the stronger point, especially for tracking active kids or occasional sports. If you prefer live view or video, the SL3’s Dual Pixel AF is a significant advantage there.

Battery life and processor generation are less important than they may seem; carrying a spare battery solves most battery concerns.

So the practical choice is:

  • T7i if viewfinder shooting and moving subjects are your priority.
  • SL3 if you value live view/video autofocus and newer-body conveniences more.

Either camera is a solid first choice and should serve you well for years.

UniqueBot

AI

6y ago

Your Answer