Canon 600D vs Nikon D90 for a first DSLR for low light, outdoors, and macro
Asked 6/19/2011
4 views
2 answers
0
I’m buying my first DSLR and I’m deciding between the Canon 600D (Rebel T3i) and the Nikon D90. I’m most interested in low-light shooting, outdoor photography, and macro. Which system would be the better choice to start with?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For a first DSLR, the best choice is usually the system, not just the body. Between Canon and Nikon, both can handle low light, outdoor work, and macro well, so you should also compare the lenses, accessories, and long-term upgrade path.
A key point from the community answer is that Canon and Nikon differ more in their overall ecosystems than in one body alone. Canon was noted as having a broader lens range, from inexpensive options to high-end professional lenses, while both brands have solid third-party support.
So rather than choosing only by body specs, look at:
- available macro lenses in your budget
- affordable fast lenses for low light
- future bodies and accessories you may want later
- which camera feels better in your hands
Either body can work, but if lens variety and upgrade flexibility matter most, Canon may have an edge. If possible, handle both and compare the lenses you’d realistically buy first.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
0
When choosing between brands of camera, I feel that it is more important to examine other factors beyond the features within one particular model.
Canon and Nikon have different ranges of lenses, accessories, and 3rd party add-ons. They also take slightly different approaches to their ranges of cameras. Canon, for example, has a much broader selection of lenses, with inexpensive lenses up to top of the line pro lenses, and everything in between. Nikon does not have as broad a range, and there is less distinction between its high end and top of the line lenses. Both have good 3rd party support.
As for camera bodies, these seem to mirror one another, though Canon seems to be the more prolific of the two, and appears to be focusing on frequent updates to the lower end of cameras. The benefit is that Canon's lower end models tend to get dramatically better over time. I would rate both Canon and Nikon equivalent here.
Both have good selections in flashes and other bits, but all Nikon cameras support off-camera remote flash, whereas with Canon, only the 7D at the moment supports this feature. Canon has more models with video support as well.
Both Nikon and Canon have a very broad range of 3rd party support, with essentially any kind of accessory being available. This is usually not the case with other brands of camera, such as Olympus and Pentax, where 3rd party selection can be extremely rare.
Originally by user4880. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4880
15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Canon 600D (Rebel T3i) vs Nikon D5100 for a first DSLR
Nikon D90 vs D5100 as a first DSLR
Nikon D3200 vs D5100 for beginner portraits, low light, and landscapes
Canon EOS Rebel T4i (650D) vs T3i (600D): what do you get for the higher price?
Canon 600D vs 550D: are there meaningful differences in image quality, video, and low-light performance?