Can low-CRI or spectrally biased lighting make food look more appealing than high-CRI light?
Asked 10/23/2018
3 views
2 answers
0
Retailers often choose lighting to flatter products. I know low-CRI light can make some items look dull, but is higher CRI always better for food displays? For example, could lighting for red sliced meat be intentionally designed with reduced green output so it appears redder and less brown? Are there known examples where unnatural spectral distribution or lower CRI is deliberately used to make food or other products look more attractive?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
3
Appearance can indeed be enhanced at the cost of CRI. There is a video showing how color appearance can create different effects by altering spectral characteristics of the illuminant and shows various items, including some colorful vegetables, with differing spectral characteristics. Check out the examples around 5:40 in this video.
The main area where different lighting is used to create different effects is the IES TM-30 work. More technical details are discussed here and here.
There is also this research that studies how to optimize for higher perceived color saturation. In particular, GAI (Gamut Area Index) is especially applicable to retail displays.
But the definition of color rendering by the CRI is limited, and many research papers have already shown that high CRI alone is not enough to reflect the true color of the products in some special applications, e.g. retails/shops, where the subjective characteristics such as attractiveness and preferences would be more useful. Progresses have been made in recent years to develop new color quality metrics. Among many metrics, gamut area index (GAI) can be a useful supplement to the well-established CRI in ensuring color saturation and satisfactory perception of the object color. A light source which has enhanced chromatic saturation (chroma) can serve to increase the visual clarity...
Originally by user58107. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user58107
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes. In retail lighting, appearance can be enhanced even when CRI is not maximized. High CRI is not always the sole goal, because CRI is a limited metric and does not fully describe how vivid, saturated, or flattering colors will look under a light source.
In practice, lighting can be tuned spectrally to emphasize certain colors and improve perceived appeal. This is especially relevant in display lighting, including food and produce, where a light source may be chosen to increase apparent color saturation rather than to render all colors as neutrally as possible.
Related lighting research and standards work, such as IES TM-30, examines these tradeoffs in more detail. Another relevant concept is GAI (Gamut Area Index), which is often used to evaluate how “rich” or saturated colors appear in retail displays.
So the general answer is yes: intentionally non-neutral spectral distributions can make some products look more attractive, even if that does not correspond to the highest CRI. The tradeoff is that other colors may become less accurate or less natural.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What surface works best for food photography backgrounds and tabletops?
How should I post-process photos shot on a dark, overcast winter day?
What in-camera factors affect visible noise in low-light flash photos?
How much image noise is acceptable, and how should I judge it for prints?
Why are my Canon PowerShot G16 night shots soft at f/1.8, and how can I make the whole scene sharper?