Can I use a strong ND filter instead of a solar filter for photographing a solar eclipse?

Asked 6/30/2017

4 views

2 answers

0

I’m seeing eclipse-photography advice that says to use a solar filter, but stores also list very strong neutral density filters such as 16-stop, 18-stop, 92,000x, or 100,000x ND filters. Aside from strength, is a solar filter optically different from a standard ND filter? Would stacking two or three ND filters give similar results, or is a dedicated solar filter necessary?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

6

Main Differences

The main differences between most neutral density(ND) filters and a solar filter(white light) come down to the filtering strength and the filtering properties. The strength of the more common ND filters range from 1-10 stops, where as for safe solar eclipse viewing you want to use 13 or more stops for imaging and 16 or more stops for direct viewing. More information of that topic can be found here (Can I photograph a solar eclipse using a 10-stop Big Stopper (+ extra ND?))

As for the filtering property differences, standard ND filters typically only cover the visible spectrum where as solar filters will also cover Infra-red(IR) and Ultraviolet(UV) radiation. I'm not aware of a regular ND filter that includes IR/UV attenuating and is 13+ stops, so I would be wary of both your camera sensor and eyes using any ND filter setup.

Less Critical Differences

Some solar filters actually render the sun in different colors such as yellow, orange, blue, and white - something you won't see in a standard ND filter.

Other Thoughts

You can read anecdotes all over the internet about people who do capture eclipses without proper solar filters, but ultimately it is not recommended if you want to protect yourself and your equipment.

There are many ways to measure the transmissiveness of filters. Be very careful comparing ND scales to optical density (OD) scales for solar filters (i.e. ND 8192 = OD 3.9 and ND3 is nowhere near OD3!), and when in question, don't ever bet your eyes on something you aren't sure of!

Sources 1,2,3,4

Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user4892

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

A solar filter is not just “a very dark ND filter.” The key differences are:

  • Strength: Common ND filters are usually far weaker than what’s recommended for the sun. For eclipse work, answers noted roughly 13+ stops for imaging and 16+ stops for direct viewing.
  • Spectral protection: Standard ND filters typically reduce mainly visible light, while proper solar filters also attenuate infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV). That matters for safety and for protecting equipment.

Because of that, stacking regular ND filters is not considered equivalent to a dedicated solar filter. Even if the visible-light reduction seems high enough, you may still lack proper IR/UV attenuation.

So for photographing the sun or an eclipse, use a dedicated white-light solar filter made for solar observation/photography rather than relying on ordinary ND filters.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer