If you can buy only one ND filter, which strength is the most versatile?

Asked 10/3/2015

7 views

2 answers

0

I’m choosing my first neutral density filter for a trip that will include landscapes, sunsets, and waterfalls, and afterward I’ll mostly use it for travel and general outdoor photography. I can only afford one fixed ND filter right now, but I’d like the most versatile option.

Common recommendations seem to be 2-stop, 3-stop, or 10-stop filters. I’ve read that 10-stop can be too specialized, while 2-stop may not do much in many situations.

If you could buy only one ND filter, which strength would you choose? And if you could add a second one later, what would complement it best?

I’m especially interested in the tradeoff between using ND for wide apertures in bright daylight versus using it for long-exposure effects like smoothing water.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

10

It really depends of the kind of pictures you want to take. Look at "What are the uses of Neutral Density (ND) filters?" for information about potential ND filter uses. You can also take a look at "What are neutral density filters and how do I use them to create long exposures in daylight?" to know more about those filters.

A direct way to know the ND filter you need would be to take a correctly exposed picture of the scene you want to capture (shutter speed "A") and then estimate the shutter speed you would like to use (shutter speed "B"). Now compute the ratio B/A and it will give you the f-stop reduction needed. If A = 1/50 sec and B = 10 sec, B/A gives 500 : you need a ND512 ND filter (9-stop reduction, because 2^9 = 512).

In my case, the first ND filter I bought was a "ND1000" because I wanted to take exposure of a few seconds in broad daylight. My estimate of a regular shutter speed was 1/250, so it becomes about 4 sec with a ND1000. Of course you can moderate it using different aperture and/or ISO.

Anyway, a rough estimate of the factor by which you want to multiply your shutter speed should be enough. You can also google pictures taken in Hawaii with ND filter.

ND filters ratings can be tricky. Take a look at Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_density_filter#ND_filter_ratings) to understand the different ones.

As a side note, I would like to add that a ND filter with a high f-stop rating might prevent you from using the AF (and you won't be seeing much in the viewfinder).

As you already pointed out, cheap variable ND filter are to be avoided.

Originally by user26456. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user26456

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The best choice depends on what you want the filter to do.

  • For wide apertures in bright daylight, a 2-stop or 3-stop ND is usually enough.
  • For long exposures in daylight, such as smoothing waterfalls or water movement, a 10-stop ND is often the more useful choice; 2–3 stops usually won’t be enough.

A practical way to choose is to meter the scene normally, decide what shutter speed you want instead, and calculate how many stops you need from the ratio. Example: if the normal exposure is 1/50s and you want 10s, that’s about 9 stops of reduction.

So if your main goal is creative long-exposure landscape work, one filter to buy first would be a 10-stop. If your priority is controlling aperture in bright light, go with 3-stop.

If you later add a second filter, pair the 10-stop with a 2- or 3-stop filter, since they serve different purposes.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer