The basic answer here is that you don't have the right tool for the job. Your camera has a fixed wide-angle lens. As you can see from What focal length lens do I need for photographing the moon?, even the supermoon is going to be very small in the frame.

In fact, I have the Fujifilm X-T10 and the 23mm lens — a very close cousin of the one built into your X100T. Here's an image I took of last weekend's supermoon with that lens:

Not exactly inspiring! That's the full image frame, of course. Someone asked if one could get better results by cropping, and the answer is "not really", because the moon here is just 51 pixels across.

Fujfilm does make a 1.4× teleconverter for your camera, increasing the field of view from standard wide angle (around 35mm in full-frame camera terms) to normal (around 50mm in full-frame terms), but even that won't buy you much. I don't have this for mine, but here's an image taken a few minutes after the above with my 56mm lens, and then scaled back to represent the size you'd get with that teleconverter:

That's pixel for pixel, not scaled (except to simulate the teleconverter). ISO 200, aperture f/5.6, shutter speed ¹⁄₅₀₀th of a second, by the way (remember, the moon is in direct, full sunlight!).

Overall, that's not awesome for a stand-alone image, but maybe you could use it one of those time-lapse eclipse montages. Do, however, note that the dynamic range needed to capture the light part of the moon and the shadowed part during an actual eclipse is pretty insane — I don't even have any respectable examples of that, because, well, mostly because I put my camera away and decided to leave this one to the people with the right gear, but also because the couple of shots I did snap during the eclipse just don't capture it properly. (I didn't use the DR400 mode; in retrospect, that would have helped a little.)

And, keep in mind that a "supermoon" isn't that different from a regular full moon. Just a few pixels added, basically — not enough to make a difference. As Neil deGrasse Tyson puts it, Would you call a 16" pizza a "super-pizza" compared to a 15" pizza?

As an alternative approach, you could hold your camera to the eyepiece of a telescope ("the afocal method"), but even then, yours isn't the best for that — it's ironically too big. You might be better off with a small point and shoot or even a phone camera.

Overall, in addition to the focal length question above (which you can't do anything about), look to What settings should I be using to shoot "Supermoon"? for more supermoon advice, and How do I get started in Astrophotography? for a very broad overview.