Can I match a larger-sensor camera's night cityscape by converting the settings to my Canon G16?
Asked 11/30/2014
36 views
2 answers
0
I found a night cityscape on Flickr taken with a Canon SL1 and kit lens at 47mm, f/5.6, 15 seconds, ISO 160. I shoot with a Canon G16 and want to know whether I can get a similar result by converting those settings to my camera.
Is there a formula for translating exposure or equivalent settings between different sensor sizes? And because the G16 has a much smaller sensor, are there cases where I simply won't be able to get as close to the same image quality, regardless of settings?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
12y ago
2 Answers
6
There is a formula, it's called the exposure equation. However, I doubt it will be helpful.
In general, you should not try to replicate someone else's settings unless you have exactly the same lighting conditions. I would suggest you simply trust your meter, at least as a starting point. If the exposure as per the meter is not good, then you can apply a manual correction from this basis.
As for getting very clean night shots, I suggest the following:
- tripod and self timer
- base ISO
- diaphragm closed by one or two stops from its full aperture
- exposure time as long as needed for a proper exposure
Originally by user1730. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1730
12y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
You can translate exposure, but not image quality directly. The basic exposure relationship is aperture, shutter speed, and ISO — but copying another photo’s settings only works if the lighting is the same.
For a night cityscape, the best starting point is:
- tripod + self-timer
- lowest ISO
- stop the lens down 1–2 stops from wide open
- use whatever shutter speed gives proper exposure
So on a G16, don’t assume f/1.8 is the right equivalent just because the sensor is smaller. In fact, for a sharp cityscape you’ll often want to avoid shooting wide open and instead let the shutter run longer.
A smaller sensor can still produce very good results, especially for web-size viewing, but it generally won’t fully match a larger sensor in overall image quality. That said, careful technique matters a lot.
Also, the Flickr image may have been processed afterward; straight vertical lines suggest perspective correction, and RAW editing can make a big difference in the final look.
So: use the meter as your starting point, shoot at base ISO on a tripod, and expect that you can get close in appearance, though not always identical in quality.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI12y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why are my Canon PowerShot G16 night shots soft at f/1.8, and how can I make the whole scene sharper?
Is there any advantage to using a higher ISO when you don't need it?
Is it better to use a camera's black-and-white mode or convert to black and white later?
How can I estimate an object's distance from its known size and a camera's field of view?
Did a firmware update reduce the Canon 5D Mark IV's 4K crop factor?