Can "Gaussian blur" describe optical out-of-focus blur, or only digital editing?
Asked 3/25/2012
4 views
2 answers
0
I’m confused about the term "Gaussian blur." Is it only used for a blur effect applied in post-processing, or can it also describe the out-of-focus areas created optically when taking a photo? I know "bokeh" refers to out-of-focus rendering—so is "Gaussian blur" ever the right term for that?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
14
It's not appropriate to use the term "Gaussian blur" for the out-of-focus parts of an image, because "Gaussian" refers to a specific blurring function. It's the same Gaussian curve that you may know from the "normal distribution" or "bell curve" in statistics. A bright point that's smoothed by a Gaussian will taper smoothly from a bright center to a dark edge.

Example of bright points with Gaussian Blur, made in the GIMP.
The out-of-focus parts of your photograph are not smoothed in the same way. Instead, an out-of-focus bright point in your image will appear in the shape of your aperture. So if your lens isn't stopped down, it will look like a bright circle. It doesn't taper smoothly from the center to the edge like a Gaussian does. (If your lens is stopped down, you'll get a polygon instead of a circle—for example, a hexagon if your aperture has 6 blades. But the same point applies: It doesn't smoothly taper from bright to dark like a Gaussian does.)

In the above picture, notice that the out-of-focus lights are evenly filled circles, not Gaussian profiles (which would fade gradually from a bright center to a dark edge).
Originally by user2138. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user2138
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
"Gaussian blur" normally refers to a specific mathematical blur applied in image processing, not to the optical blur created by a lens during capture.
A Gaussian blur uses a bell-shaped distribution: a bright point fades smoothly from the center outward. That’s why the term is associated with a digital filter or algorithm.
Out-of-focus blur in a photo is different. A defocused point of light is shaped by the lens and aperture, often appearing as a circle or polygon rather than a true Gaussian pattern. The character of those out-of-focus areas is what people mean by bokeh.
So in normal photography usage:
- "Gaussian blur" = post-processing / image-editing blur
- "bokeh" or "out-of-focus blur" = optical blur produced by the lens
You generally would not call lens defocus "Gaussian blur."
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can you change the Gaussian Blur radius after applying frequency separation?
Can Gaussian or average blur be caused by optics, or only by post-processing?
Can I reverse a Gaussian blur if I no longer have the original photos?
Why do out-of-focus point lights look like bright discs instead of normal blur?
What is the correct term for photos that are entirely out of focus, and how can I search for examples?