Can cameras use non-RGB or extra spectral channels, and what would the images look like?

Asked 7/11/2016

4 views

2 answers

0

Digital cameras usually use RGB color filters because they are designed to reproduce scenes for human vision. What happens if a camera instead uses different wavelength bands, such as ultraviolet, infrared, or several closely spaced visible bands? Is this already done in photography or imaging, what consumer options exist, and what practical or technical limits are there?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

12

Color photography is indeed based on the tri-color theory. The world saw the first color picture in 1861 made using red, green, and blue filters by James Clark Maxwell. Today’s color photography is based on his method. In 1891, Gabriel Lippmann demonstrated full color images using a single sheet of black & white film, no filters, no colored dye or pigment. This process fell by the wayside because the beautiful images could not be copied or duplicated. In the 1950’s Dr. Edwin Land of the Polaroid Corporation demonstrated that he could make beautiful color pictures using just two colors (579 & 599 nanometers). This too fell by the wayside.

Imaging engineers, long ago wanted to image using the non-visual portion of the spectrum. It was quickly discovered that ordinary photo plates and film imaged only recording violet and blue light as well as ultraviolet (4 nanometers to 380 nanometers). They discovered that films record X-Ray and infrared.

What other portions of the spectrum can be imaged? Astronomers image via radio frequencies Weathermen and the aviation industry, image via radar. The optical microscope is limited to about 1000X, however the electron microscope images molecules and atoms.

We image the human body using sound waves (ultrasound). We image the human body using radio waves (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI).

There are countless other ways to image. At first images made using the non-visual portion of the spectrum were presented only in black & white. After all, we can’t see via this radiation, so any graphic image we present will be an incorrect presentation.

Now doctors looking at X-rays are looking for subtle changes in shades of gray. With computer logic we can change black & white tones into false colors to better differentiate. Thus the modern X-ray and sonogram are displayed with false colors. The other imaging disciplines of science follow suit. False color images made from the non-visual portions of the spectrum are routine.

Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user44949

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—this is already done, but usually as false-color or specialized imaging rather than normal consumer color photography.

Standard RGB is used because the goal is to make images that look natural to human eyes. If a camera captures UV, IR, X-ray, or other bands, those signals must be mapped into visible colors somehow, since we cannot directly see them. That’s why scientific and astronomical images are often false color.

Consumer examples exist. Thermal/FLIR cameras map infrared data into visible colors. Some cameras also record a bit beyond visible light unless strong cut filters are used; for example, IR leakage can hurt normal color accuracy. Modified cameras can have sensor filters removed to capture more IR, and specialized filtering can isolate chosen bands.

Practical limits are significant. Lens glass often blocks much of the UV, and sensors/optics are not equally sensitive across all wavelengths. Expanding capture outside the visible range can reduce color accuracy and often gives results that are more novelty or niche than generally useful.

Using more than three bands is possible in principle, but the output still has to be compressed into colors we can view, unless it is being used for measurement or analysis rather than realistic photography.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer