Can an astronomy telescope be used as a super-telephoto lens for wildlife or other terrestrial photography?
Asked 1/7/2013
7 views
2 answers
0
Can an astronomical telescope be used in place of a camera super-telephoto prime lens for earthbound subjects such as shorebirds? I realize a telescope is not a zoom, so I’m really asking about using it as a very long fixed-focal-length lens. Can telescopes focus close enough for terrestrial subjects, and what practical limitations or tradeoffs are there compared with a purpose-built camera telephoto lens?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
11
would ever make sense to use a astronomy telescope + camera mount as an earthbound zoom lens
As far as I know, telescopes generally (always?) have a fixed focal length. Instead of changing magnification by moving internal lens elements as a zoom lens does, the magnification of a telescope is changed by switching eyepieces. So technically, no, you can't use a telescope as a zoom lens.
That said, yes, you can use a telescope as a long focal length lens. Telescopes I've tried in the past had no problem focusing on objects much closer than celestial objects, perhaps a few hundred meters away, so focusing shouldn't be an issue.
Originally by user4262. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4262
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes — a telescope can be used as a very long fixed-focal-length lens for terrestrial photography. It is not a zoom; focal length is fixed, and changing magnification normally involves different eyepieces, not zooming.
Focusing is usually possible for distant earthbound subjects, and users report telescopes can focus much closer than astronomical infinity. They can work well for relatively static subjects like birds at long range.
Practical tradeoffs:
- Most setups are manual focus only, and at long focal lengths depth of focus is very thin.
- Some telescope types are awkward for daytime use; refractors, SCTs, and Maks are generally more practical than Newtonian reflectors.
- Many telescopes have a curved focal plane, so edge sharpness may suffer on camera sensors unless you use a field flattener or a scope designed for imaging.
- A solid mount is important; with a balanced mount, panning can be smooth.
So the idea is viable, especially for specialized long-reach work, but it is less convenient than a purpose-built telephoto lens because of manual operation, mounting needs, and possible optical compromises.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Is digiscoping a practical alternative to a super-telephoto lens for bird photography?
What’s the better budget setup for deep-sky astrophotography: telescope on a tracking mount or telephoto lens on an AstroTrac?
Are adapted long telephoto lenses practical on Micro Four Thirds for wildlife and birds?
Can a macro lens be used for portraits, wildlife, or sports at longer distances?
Good starter telephoto lens for Canon wildlife photography?