Can a Fujifilm FinePix S8600 capture the Milky Way?
Asked 11/28/2018
2 views
2 answers
0
I want to try photographing the Milky Way with a Fujifilm FinePix S8600 bridge camera before I buy a DSLR. In a mildly light-polluted area, it captured the stars I could see with my eyes, but this camera is limited to 8 seconds up to ISO 1600, and only 2 seconds at ISO 3200/6400. Since people often recommend around 10 seconds at ISO 800 for Milky Way shots, is this camera capable enough, or are its sensor and exposure limits too restrictive?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
1
A few things to consider when deciding on a camera to take images of the Milky way;
The Sensor surface area
• The s8600 has a surface area of 28mm2 with about 16m Pixels
• In comparison, a full frame camera such as the Canon 5D IV has a sensor surface area of 864mm2 with over 30m pixels
Photosites / Pixels
The larger the photosite/pixel, the more information you will capture of the Milkyway
• The s8600 has a pixel area of 1.8 micrometre2
• In comparison, the full frame camera such as the Canon 5D IV has a pixel area of 28.74 micrometre2
As you can see, the Fuji s8600 is already at a great disadvantage
ISO and Shutter
Ideally, you need to allow in as much light as possible without capturing the earths movement. Refer to the 500 rule.
Therefore, if I was to take the widest focal length (25mm), the best ISO (6400) and f-stop (f/2.9) that your S8600 offers and set the full frame Canon 5D with these exact measurements, I can use a maximum shutter speed of 13 Seconds to fill the photosites.
If I want to keep the noise levels down, and dial in at ISO 3200, then I need a shutter speed of 20 Seconds.
Once again, the Fuji s8600 is at great disadvantage as it is not able to achieve this.
Stacking
However, all is not lost, and you can try photo stacking 100’s of stills;
• Depending on what you wish to capture you can use whatever focal length suits your needs
• Dial in at ISO 3200, f2.9 and shutter speed of 1 or 2 seconds (it will take trial and error over a few days)
• Then mounted on a tripod, capture between 300x-500x images. ( Also referred to as light frames)
• You will need to manually turn the camera every 30 or so images to keep up with the rotation of the earth.
• Once these have been captured, you need to capture about 20x Dark frames. These are the same settings, but you put the lens cap back on and then just click 20 times
• And finally, capture about 20x Bias frames. These are as above, but with the shutter speed set to the maximum of your camera.
- for your first trial, take 30-50 Light frames, 5-8 Dark and bias frames and then work from there
• Download a piece of software called Deepskystacker
• Before you go to bed, import all of these images into the software and then let your computer churn away till the morning.
• In the morning, you will have an image where all the images have been stacked, aligned and cropped with sensor noise minimised and maximum light captured.
• Bring this image into Lightroom and adjust however you wish
Hope this makes some sense and helps you in deciding on how to approach photographing the Milkyway.
My advice, purchase a full frame camera if you are serious about astrophotography.
Originally by user34085. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user34085
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
You may be able to record some stars, but the S8600 is at a real disadvantage for Milky Way photography. Its very small sensor and tiny pixels gather much less light than larger-sensor cameras, so image noise and lack of detail will be bigger problems.
The 8-second limit at ISO 1600 is also restrictive. For Milky Way shots, you generally want the widest lens setting, the widest aperture available, a dark sky, and the longest shutter speed you can use before star trailing becomes obvious (often estimated with the “500 rule”).
So: yes, you can try, and under dark skies you might get a basic result, but don’t expect the kind of Milky Way images you see from DSLR or mirrorless cameras with larger sensors. Light pollution will make it even harder.
Best approach: use the widest focal length, widest aperture, ISO 1600 if usable, 8 seconds, and shoot from the darkest location possible. If your goal is strong Milky Way detail, a larger-sensor camera will make a big difference.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
For Milky Way shots, is a shorter exposure at higher ISO better than a longer exposure at lower ISO?
Why are only full-stop ISO values selectable on my Canon 7D Mark II?
How can I improve a Milky Way photo taken at 18mm, f/3.5, ISO 6400, 30s?
Can a Panasonic Lumix FZ30 photograph the Milky Way?
How should I expose Milky Way photos, and how much do streetlights or moonlight matter?