Can a Canon EF 75-300mm be used for jewelry close-ups, or should I use a different lens?
Asked 6/9/2014
2 views
2 answers
0
I’m helping photograph jewelry for sale with a Canon EOS 550D and a Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM. The lens can frame the pieces large enough, but its minimum focus distance is about 4.9 ft, so the camera has to be placed far away.
The jewelry is typically around 2 inches across, and we’d like roughly 1–2 inches of depth of field. Can this telephoto lens be made practical for close-up product work with extension tubes or a screw-in close-up filter, or is a different lens a better choice?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
12y ago
2 Answers
1
I haven't fully run the maths, but my gut feel is that you're going to be stuck for depth of field; at a focal length of 75mm, f/16 and a subject distance of 24 inches, your depth of field is "only" 1.4 inches (according to DOFMaster). Increasing focal length or going closer will reduce the DoF further, which isn't what you want. Of course, DoF is an imprecise measurement (what is acceptable sharpness to you may not be to someone else), but 2" is looking like a bit of a stretch.
I suspect the real answer here is that she's trying to use the wrong kit. For a lot of product photography (i.e. stuff which is going to appear in catalogs, etc rather than being blown up to poster size), you don't need a large sensor - but you do need to get your lighting right. With a light tent, even a relatively cheap point-and-shoot on a tripod will let you get "good enough" product shots for many purposes - and the advantage of the small sensor in a point-and-shoot is that your depth of field is much greater.
Originally by user11371. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11371
12y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The 75-300mm is not a good choice for jewelry close-ups. A long telephoto already gives shallow depth of field, and going closer or using more focal length reduces it further. For small objects where you want about 1–2 inches of usable depth of field, this setup will be limiting.
Extension tubes are also a poor match for a lens like 75-300mm: they have much less effect on long focal lengths, and this lens is not known for strong optical quality, so added magnification tends to magnify its weaknesses.
A better approach is to use a shorter lens. Even a decent Canon EF-S 18-55mm kit lens is more suitable, and extension tubes make far more sense on that kind of lens. Best of all would be a true macro lens.
Also, for jewelry and other product photography, lighting matters hugely. A simple controlled setup such as a light tent can make more difference than trying to force the telephoto to work.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI12y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Which Canon telephoto zoom is the better buy on a Rebel T3i: EF-S 55-250 IS, EF 70-300 IS, or EF 75-300?
Why do my Canon 200D photos look noisy with the EF 24mm f/2 lens?
What focal length is best for whale watching with a Canon T6i?
Budget safari camera setup for a Canon T1i and a second compact camera
Are a Canon 50mm f/1.8 and 75-300mm good upgrades from the 18-55mm kit lens on a Rebel T1i?