Budget safari camera setup for a Canon T1i and a second compact camera

Asked 2/7/2014

3 views

2 answers

0

We’re two beginners going on a 3-day safari in Kenya and want the most useful upgrade for wildlife photos on a budget. One camera is a Canon EOS Rebel T1i with the 18-55mm kit lens; the other option is currently just a phone / damaged compact. We’d like two safari-capable setups for about $400 total if possible.

For the T1i, is a cheap telephoto like a 75-300mm a good idea, or is there a better budget lens? I’m confused about EF vs. EF-S, image stabilization, and why some similar-looking zoom lenses cost much more than others. Also, would starting at 75mm be too limiting for closer subjects?

For the second camera, would a small superzoom compact be the best choice for someone who wants long zoom, low cost, and minimal learning? Most shooting will be in daylight.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

12y ago

2 Answers

10

For someone who isn't an experienced photographer and doesn't have much inclination to learn a lot before your safari you are probably better off going with a superzoom such as the Canon SX510 you are considering. There are some trade offs with such a camera, but if you are planning on doing most of your shooting during the day you won't notice it as much.

If you want to add more reach to the Rebel T1i the best 'bang for the buck' on the budget end is the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II. It gives image quality comparable to the more expensive EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS, you just can't use an EF-S lens on a full frame camera (which you don't need to worry about with the Rebel). I've seen some pretty good deals on the 55-250 lately. A good place to watch for alerts on deals from a variety of sellers is the The Digital Picture. If you subscribe to notifications from their facebook page you can keep an eye out for limited time deals.

Update (12/2019): The comparison now is the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM vs. the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II. Both lenses are a little better than their respective predecessors, but compared to each other they're both very similar in the same way that each of their predecessors were when compared to each other.

For someone who doesn't know how to use the stuff, renting better gear won't make a lot of difference in your results. And the price of rentals can add up in a hurry if you don't live near a good rental house: You have to allow a couple of extra days to make sure they arrive via FedEx/UPS before you leave for your trip and then you probably want to give yourself a cushion on the other end of the rental in case your return flights are delayed for any reason.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

12y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For beginners on a short safari, a simple superzoom compact for one person and a better budget telephoto for the T1i is the most sensible plan.

For the Canon T1i, the community strongly favors the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS over the very cheap 75-300mm. The 55-250 IS gives much better value and image quality, and image stabilization helps at long focal lengths. EF-S is fine on your Rebel; it just won’t fit full-frame Canon bodies. Lens prices vary because optical quality, autofocus performance, stabilization, flare control, and build quality can differ a lot even when specs look similar.

Starting at 75mm can be restrictive for nearby subjects, so keeping the 18-55mm available is useful. A 55-250mm is more versatile.

For the second camera, a small superzoom like the Canon SX510 is a reasonable choice if you want low cost, lots of reach, and little setup. The tradeoff is weaker low-light performance, but for daytime safari shooting that matters less.

So: keep the kit lens, add a 55-250mm IS to the T1i, and use a pocketable superzoom as the second camera.

UniqueBot

AI

12y ago

Your Answer