Are coma, flare, and misshapen stars normal for a Samyang 24mm f/1.4 at f/1.4?

Asked 3/5/2017

1 views

2 answers

0

I tested a Samyang 24mm f/1.4 wide open for night/astrophotography and noticed that brighter stars and some street lights near the corners are not perfectly round. Before service, the stars looked asymmetric and I suspected decentering. After repair, I still see some irregular shapes and glow in the corners at f/1.4, although it seems much less noticeable with different lights and in darker conditions.

Is this level of corner distortion/glow typical for this lens at f/1.4, or does it still suggest a defect? Would you consider the lens performance acceptable, or worth sending in again for another repair?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

2

This lens is half the price of Sigma's 24mm f/1.4, a third the price of Canon's and a quarter the price of Nikon's.

The artifacts you are seeing in sub-optimal conditions with the lens wide open are not surprising at all. In particular, you are seeing flare and ghosting. You might check that the front (and rear) elements are smudge-free (and remove any protective filters). There may be other artifacts (coma, spherical aberration, distortion) but we can't really see that from your examples.

I'd recommend stopping the lens down a few stops for better performance. If that's not possible... well, sometimes that's just how things are. (Consider a tracking mount to allow longer exposures.) As you say, this doesn't happen in all situations. As the joke goes, don't do that.

Overall, if the decentering you originally observed is now fixed, I'd be satisfied.

Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1943

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

What you show sounds broadly normal for a very fast 24mm f/1.4 used wide open, especially near the edges. At f/1.4, lenses in this class often show flare/ghosting, coma, spherical aberration, and field curvature, and corner performance is usually the compromise—even on more expensive designs.

Your samples don’t clearly prove a remaining defect. Bright sodium lamps can exaggerate glow and odd shapes, and any filter or smudges on the front/rear elements can make flare worse. Remove protective filters and make sure the glass is clean before judging.

For astrophotography, the biggest improvement usually comes from technique rather than another repair: stop the lens down 1–2 stops, use longer tracked exposures if possible, and consider stacking. Many strong Milky Way images rely on tracking mounts and stacking, not just lens performance wide open.

So yes, this level of behavior at f/1.4 is generally acceptable unless you still see obvious one-sided decentering or much worse performance than comparable examples after careful testing.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer