Will moving Lightroom to an SSD noticeably improve performance on an older iMac?

Asked 1/13/2012

5 views

2 answers

0

I use Lightroom 3.6 on a 2006 24-inch iMac (2.15 GHz Core 2 Duo, 3 GB RAM, macOS Lion). My Lightroom catalog has about 21,000 images. The catalog is stored on the internal drive, while the photo files are on external storage. Lightroom feels sluggish: sliders can be jumpy and switching modules can pause noticeably.

I’m trying to decide whether installing an SSD in this iMac would meaningfully improve Lightroom performance, or whether the main bottlenecks are limited RAM/CPU, catalog size, or Lightroom settings. I’m also wondering whether low free disk space affects OS paging enough to matter here, and whether reducing catalog size would help the interface feel more responsive.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

14

I recently got an SSD drive for my primary boot drive. It was a moderately fast one, with consistent 270mb/s read and write speeds. I've used lightroom with the catalog both on the SSD and on a normal HDD, and I did not see a whole lot of performance improvement for my catalog, which is about 12,000 photos or so.

As I started investigating how to improve the performance of Lightroom, I realized that the most significant factor that affected performance was the Camera RAW Cache size (Preferences -> File Handling -> Camera Raw Cache Settings -> Maximum Size). It defaults to 1Gb, however when working with a large number of RAW photos, a 1Gb cache is FAR, FAR too small. Increasing it to at least 20Gb offered good improvement, and increasing it to 50Gb offered considerable improvement. The improvement was a bit better on the SSD, however given the value of SSD space, I again moved the cache off onto a normal HDD. The performance gains are still evident, and I'm quite happy using LR with all of its data on a normal hard drive.

It should be noted that SSD's come in a very BROAD range of speeds and capabilities. Some are fairly slow relative to an HDD (which can usually offer around 60mb/s burst rates), where as some are insanely fast. SSD burst rates can range from as low as around 100mb/s or even lower for really cheap drives, to as high as 700mb/s or even more for highly specialized designs...such as those that fit into a PCI-E slot. Some SSD's include built-in high-speed secondary caches, some have better data distribution algorithms that optimize read or write speeds, etc. All these factors can affect whether an SSD might show a significant improvement for Lightroom performance or not. Lightroom generally stores the working image in memory, so if you are worried about single-image development speed, an SSD is not going to help much. The performance gains that can be realized from faster storage drive speeds happen when moving between files, performing multi-file operations, etc. The bottom line is...the more money you are willing to spend for better SSD technology and faster burst rate, the more likely you are to see an improvement.

Originally by user124. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user124

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

An SSD can help Lightroom feel faster for disk-related tasks: booting, launching Lightroom, opening catalogs/files, and loading large images. It will not significantly speed up CPU-bound work like applying edits, rendering, exports, or other heavy computations.

From the community reports, SSD gains in Lightroom are mixed. One user saw little improvement with the catalog on SSD, while another saw a major improvement, especially with very large files such as panoramas. So yes, an SSD can help, but it may not solve jumpy sliders or module lag on an older 2-core machine with only 3 GB RAM.

A more directly useful Lightroom tweak is increasing the Camera Raw cache. The default 1 GB cache is often too small for large RAW workflows; users reported much better responsiveness after raising it to 20–50 GB.

Catalog size alone is unlikely to be the main cause here. Your older hardware and limited memory are more probable bottlenecks.

Bottom line: an SSD should improve general responsiveness and file access, but don’t expect dramatic improvement in all Lightroom operations. If you keep this iMac, increasing Camera Raw cache is a good first step; otherwise, saving toward a newer machine may give the bigger overall benefit.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer