Will a full-frame Canon body show more detail than APS-C with the EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro?
Asked 5/8/2012
0 views
2 answers
0
I mainly shoot handheld macro and currently use a Canon 40D with a Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro. I’m considering upgrading to either a full-frame 5D Mark II/III or an APS-C 7D. My main goal is to get the most detail and overall performance from this lens. How do full frame and APS-C compare here, especially considering resolution, pixel density, edge performance, and higher-ISO use for faster shutter speeds?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
7
Oddly, no.
Lenses often have more aberrations towards the edges, so most them do not perform as well on a full-frame. By using a DSLR with a cropped sensor, you use the best performing part of the lens.
To get the most out of it, you need high pixel density, so all the 18 MP Canon cropped DSLRs will do. The 7D among those is top-of-the line with a 100% coverage viewfinder and a weather-sealed body but the 60D is smaller and will give you the same quality.
Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1620
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
There isn’t a single “best” sensor format for getting the most from that lens; it depends on what you mean by “best.”
APS-C bodies like the 7D have higher pixel density, which can capture more detail on a small subject when you’re limited by magnification. They also use the center of the lens, which is often the sharpest part.
A full-frame body can record more total detail across the whole image because the sensor is physically larger, but it also includes more of the lens’s outer image circle, where performance may be weaker on some lenses.
So for macro work on small subjects, an APS-C body can be an advantage because of pixel density and center-only lens use. For maximum detail across a larger frame, full frame can be advantageous.
In short: no, full frame is not necessary to get excellent results from the EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro. If your priority is macro subject detail per frame, APS-C is a strong choice; if you want the larger sensor’s overall image advantages, full frame may still appeal.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Canon 7D vs 5D Mark III for sports with the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS
Is it worth moving from a Canon 700D to a 6D if my only full-frame lens is a 50mm f/1.8?
Will a Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM work properly on a 5D Mark III full-frame body?
Choosing a macro lens for a Canon APS-C body: 60mm vs 100mm for macro and portraits
Which lenses should I keep when moving from Canon APS-C to full frame?