Will a Canon EOS 500D with a Tamron 90mm macro give good macro image quality?
Asked 9/3/2017
47 views
2 answers
0
I have a Canon EOS 500D that I’ve never been very happy with for image quality, especially compared with my Lumix FZ200. I’m getting more interested in macro photography and I’m considering a Tamron 90mm f/2.8 1:1 macro lens for the Canon. Before buying, I’d like to know whether this camera/lens combination is capable of producing sharp, good-looking macro photos, or whether the body is likely to hold it back. My main concerns are that the Canon images have seemed less bright, less colourful, and not as sharp as I expected.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
3
From your comments:
the colours aren't as bright
Colours from cameras are almost entirely down to how the image is processed. The default settings for compact cameras and (particularly) mobile phones tend to have higher contrast and saturation than SLRs, so photos from SLRs can look a bit flat if you're comparing them with those from a compact camera. But there's nothing stopping you increasing the contrast and saturation, either in-camera for the JPEG output from the camera, or in whatever tool you're using to process the images.
The Canon shots have never seemed very sharp
While it's true that sharpness is limited by the sensor and the lens at the top end, it's much more limited by the technique of the photographer. As has been commented, the depth of field from an SLR is much smaller than that from a compact camera, so you need to be much more careful with your focusing if you want to get the sharpness on the objects you want it on. It's very worth reading why are my photos not crisp? for a lot of things that you can try to improve. Don't buy any new kit until you're sure that it's your kit that's limiting you rather than your technique - particularly macro kit where your DoF becomes razor-thin.
Originally by user11371. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11371
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes — a Canon 500D with a Tamron 90mm macro should be capable of very good macro results. The body is not the main limitation here.
From the answers, your concerns about colour and brightness are mostly about image processing, not sensor quality. DSLRs often produce more neutral-looking JPEGs than bridge cameras and phones, which tend to boost contrast and saturation. You can change the in-camera picture style or adjust contrast/saturation in post-processing.
Sharpness is also often more about technique than equipment. In macro photography, depth of field is extremely shallow, so even a good lens can look soft if focus, aperture, shutter speed, lighting, or camera stability aren’t well controlled.
The Tamron 90mm macro is a well-regarded true macro lens, and paired with the 500D it should deliver detailed images if used carefully. If you were unhappy with the Canon before, that doesn’t necessarily mean the combination will disappoint — it may mean your expectations were shaped by the more punchy default rendering of the bridge camera.
In short: the 500D + 90mm macro is a viable setup for strong macro photography, but technique and processing will matter a lot.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM vs Tamron 90mm f/2.8 VC Macro for macro and portraits
Can a bellows turn a 1:2 macro lens into 1:1 macro?
Why is my Tamron SP 90mm Macro only focusing to about 10 ft?
Do these lenses cover landscapes and butterfly photography on a Canon EOS 4000D?
What do 1:1 and 1:2 magnification ratios mean on a macro lens?