Why were my bird-in-flight photos underexposed at 1/2500s, f/5.6, ISO 100?
Asked 4/26/2020
5 views
2 answers
0
I was photographing a bird flying in my backyard with a Nikon D3400 and a 200mm lens around noon on a bright sunny day. I set 1/2500s to freeze motion, used the widest aperture available at that focal length (f/5.6), and ISO 100. The images came out very underexposed.
Is this simply because the shutter speed was too fast, or is the bright sky/background affecting exposure as well? I was also using continuous shooting. What exposure and metering approach works better for birds in flight?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
6y ago
2 Answers
2
When you shoot a bird in flight, you are shooting a rather dark object(*) against a light background, so general exposure rules hardly apply.
Using auto-exposure is better (this takes in account changes in orientation from the sun or passing clouds), but with a 200mm the bird must be a rather tiny part of the picture so the camera mostly exposes for the bright sky in the background and the bird is under-exposed.
The solutions:
- Set you camera to use "spot" metering, so that the camera computes the exposure from a small centered part of the frame. This reduces the influence of the background. Problem: your bird has to be there at the center when you take the shot, otherwise your camera will expose for the sky. So this requires a very accurate aim for a bird in flight.
- Keep the standard "weighted" metering, but use exposure compensation to overexpose by about one EV (or more if necessary, after checking your first few shots).
- If you shoot "raw" you can recover some of the under-exposure in post-production (the necessary data will have been lost if you only have the JPEG). One limitation is that you may want to use burst mode and using raw will slow down the bursts or even limit their length.
- You can mix 2) and 3), over-expose a bit and recover more from the raw.
- You can of course shoot in manual mode, but you have to use your histogram regularly to check that your settings are still adequate.
Note that in all cases, since the bird is dark, your camera has less light to work with so this reduces the speed you can use. Since your camera AF will also struggle, you will have to use a small aperture to get some depth of field. Expect a large trash ratio.
Learn to shoot with both eyes open, one in the viewfinder and one outside. This makes birds a lot easier to frame.
(*) Unless you shoot seagulls, but these are easy targets, so you wouldn't be asking here...
Originally by user75947. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user75947
6y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—1/2500s at f/5.6, ISO 100 can easily be too dark, even in bright sun. Using the Sunny 16 rule as a guide, bright sun at ISO 100 is roughly f/16 at 1/125s. Opening to f/5.6 gives you about 3 stops more light, which only gets you to around 1/1000s. So 1/2500s is a bit over 1 stop underexposed even before accounting for haze, clouds, or the bird being in less direct light.
Also, birds in flight are often dark subjects against a bright sky, so normal metering may expose for the sky and leave the bird too dark.
What helps:
- use auto exposure if light is changing
- try spot, center-weighted, or partial metering so the sky has less influence
- keep the bird near the metering area if using spot metering
- raise ISO when you need very fast shutter speeds
- shoot with the sun behind you when possible
Continuous shooting is fine; it doesn’t cause underexposure by itself.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI6y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why did the Sunny 16 rule underexpose my shaded subject on a sunny day?
How do I expose and focus flying seagulls so they don’t turn into white blobs?
Why does an equivalent exposure table differ from the Sunny 16 rule?
How can I photograph active children indoors in low light without blur or flash?
What flash guide number is needed to keep a sunny-day subject properly exposed while darkening the background by 2 stops?